Caminhos para a inclusão: as reflexões lúdicas e a orientação podem ser aceitas no final do arco-íris LGBTQIA+?

Publicado 2025-03-19


https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5226.2025
##galleys.btn##
PDF (Espanhol) FLIP HTML (Espanhol) XML (Espanhol) ePUB (Espanhol)
Edição
v. 25 n. 1 (2025): Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)
Seção
Artículos de Investigación
Como Citar
Tinoco Giraldo, H. . (2025). Caminhos para a inclusão: as reflexões lúdicas e a orientação podem ser aceitas no final do arco-íris LGBTQIA+?. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5226.2025
Baixar Citação
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5226.2025
Dimensions
PlumX

Como Citar

Tinoco Giraldo, H. . (2025). Caminhos para a inclusão: as reflexões lúdicas e a orientação podem ser aceitas no final do arco-íris LGBTQIA+?. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5226.2025

Baixar Citação

##articleSummary.license##
Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Harold Tinoco Giraldo
Baylor College of Medicine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-3669 ORCID
##submission.authorBio##

Contexto: Apesar da crescente aceitação das pessoas LGBTQIA+, especialmente nos campi universitários, o processo de se assumir continua difícil e potencialmente isolante para muitos jovens adultos. Os relacionamentos de apoio, especialmente a orientação, poderiam beneficiar significativamente as pessoas LGBTQIA+. Ob-jetivo: apresentar e avaliar o “Rainbow Pathways”, um jogo com uma experiência de mentoria projetado para orientar pessoas LGBTQIA+ a se assumirem e a na-vegarem em situações sociais complexas, incluindo problemas de saúde mental e namoro. Métodos: foram coletados e analisados dados qualitativos de 33 estu-dantes universitários que participaram do jogo Rainbow Pathways. Resultados: os participantes relataram que o jogo era acessível, oferecia apoio social e fornecia percepções educacionais sobre questões relacionadas à inclusão. O jogo permitiu que eles refletissem sobre suas próprias experiências e as de outros estudantes LGBTQIA+. Conclusões: O Rainbow Pathways se mostra promissor como fer-ramenta de apoio a jovens adultos LGBTQIA+. Entretanto, são necessárias mais pesquisas para determinar sua aplicabilidade a um público mais amplo, além dos estudantes universitários.

Visão geral 119 | Visualizações de PDF 26

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.
  1. Allen L, Cowie L, Fenaughty J. Safe but not safe: LGBTTIQA+ students’ experiences of a university campus. Higher Education Research & Development. 2020 Sep 18;39(6):1075-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1706453
  2. Alserri SA, Zin NA, Wook TS. Gender-based engagement model for serious games. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. 2018 Aug;8(4):1350-7.
  3. Alvarado A, Mujtaba BG. The evolution of LGBTQIA+ personnel in the American workplace. Journal of Business Diversity. 2023 May 6;23(1).
  4. Asakura K. It takes a village: Applying a social ecological framework of resilience in working with LGBTQ youth. Families in Society. 2016 Jan;97(1):15-22. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.4
  5. Bateman C. Implicit game aesthetics. Games and Culture. 2015 Jul;10(4):389-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014560607
  6. Beanlands RA, Robinson LJ, Venance SL. An LGBTQ+ mentorship program enriched the experience of medical students and physician mentors. Canadian Medical Education Journal. 2020 Dec;11(6):e159. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.69936
  7. Beltman S, Helker K, Fischer S. 'I Really Enjoy It': Emotional Engagement of University Peer Mentors. International Journal of Emotional Education. 2019 Nov;11(2):50-70.
  8. Briscoe P. Virtual mentor partnerships between practicing and preservice teachers: Helping to enhance professional growth and well-being. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 2019 Oct 15;8(4):235-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0023
  9. De Coninck D, d'Haenens L. Gendered perspectives on digital skills and digital activities: Comparing non-binary and binary youth. Comunicar. 2023 Apr 1;31(75):35-45. https://doi.org/10.3916/C75-2023-03
  10. Freeman JB. Measuring and resolving LGBTQ disparities in STEM. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2020 Oct;7(2):141-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/237273222094323
  11. Goethe O, Goethe O. Visual aesthetics in games and gamification. Gamification mindset. 2019:85-92.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11078-9_8
  12. Gomez K, Gomez LM, Worsley M. Interrogating the role of CSCL in diversity, equity, and inclusion. International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. 2021:103-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_6
  13. Gongsook P, Peijnenborgh J, Van der Spek E, Hu J, Bellotti F, Berta R, De Gloria A, Curatelli F, Martinengo C, Rauterberg M, Hendriksen J. Designing a serious game as a diagnostic tool. InGames and Learning Alliance: Third International Conference, GALA 2014, Bucharest, Romania, July 2-4, 2014, Revised Selected Papers 3 2015 (pp. 63-72). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22960-7_7
  14. Goodrich A. Counterpoint in the music classroom: Creating an environment of resilience with peer mentoring and LGBTQIA+ students. International Journal of Music Education. 2020 Nov;38(4):582-92 https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420949373
  15. Gowdy G, Hogan S, Roosevelt K, Saastamoinen M, Levine S. Informal mentoring for foster youth students: Core and capital mentors over time. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2023 Apr;40(2):221-36.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00899-5
  16. Graham BE. Queerly unequal: LGBT+ students and mentoring in higher education. Social Sciences. 2019 Jun 5;8(6):171. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8060171
  17. Higa D, Hoppe MJ, Lindhorst T, Mincer S, Beadnell B, Morrison DM, Wells EA, Todd A, Mountz S. Negative and positive factors associated with the well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth. Youth & society. 2014 Sep;46(5):663-87.
  18. Holloway IW, Miyashita Ochoa A, Wu ES, Himmelstein R, Wong JO, Wilson BD. Perspectives on academic mentorship from sexual and gender minority students pursuing careers in the health sciences. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2019;89(3):343. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000410
  19. Krisi M, Nagar R. The effect of peer mentoring on mentors themselves: A case study of college students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2023 Jul 29;70(5):803-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1910934
  20. Lee MJ. Increasing minority youths' participation in computing through near-peer mentorship. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 2019 Oct;35(3).
  21. Mara LC, Ginieis M, Brunet-Icart I. Strategies for coping with LGBT discrimination at work: A systematic literature review. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. 2021 Jun; 18:339-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00462-w
  22. Matera IF. “Esta es mi historia”: Podcasts sonoros para pensar la discriminación hacia los jóvenes LGBT en la escolarización secundaria en Argentina. Biblioteca de Trabajos Finales de la FCH. 2019;3(2):1-08.
  23. Melián E, Reyes JI, Meneses J. The online PhD experience: A qualitative systematic review. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2023 Feb;24(1):137-58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6780
  24. Mueller J. Data Visualization and Advocacy for Sexual and Gender Minority Health. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries. 2022 May 4;18(1-2):115-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2022.2139329
  25. Oktavanya R, Panjaitan YA. The Ambivalence of Life Is Strange in Portraying Its Female Characters. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS). 2019 Aug 29;3(1):14-29. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2019.030102
  26. Pavlounis D. Straightening up the archive: Queer historiography, queer play, and the archival politics of Gone Home. Television & New Media. 2016 Nov;17(7):579-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416631627
  27. Pon-Barry H, Packard BW, St. John A. Expanding capacity and promoting inclusion in introductory computer science: a focus on near-peer mentor preparation and code review. Computer Science Education. 2017 Jan 2;27(1):54-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1333270
  28. Pryor JT, Nachman BR. Conceptualizing digital campus climate within LGBTQ+ resource center websites: A critical discourse analysis. Innovative Higher Education. 2022 Aug;47(4):587-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09590-6
  29. Rios O, Font-Palomar M, Flecha A, Valls R. Violence against LGBTIQ+ people at universities: the need to uncover a silent reality. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2680-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221111471
  30. Romero M, Kalmpourtzis G. Constructive alignment in game design for learning activities in higher education. Information. 2020 Feb 25;11(3):126. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11030126
  31. Rosé CP, Järvelä S. Building community together: towards equitable CSCL practices and processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2020 Sep; 15:249-55.
  32. Ruberg B. Queer Indie Game Making: An Interview with Mo Cohen. Indie games in the digital age. 2020 Apr 16; 8:35.
  33. Salvati M, Pistella J, Baiocco R. Gender roles and internalized sexual stigma in gay and lesbian persons: A quadratic relation. International Journal of Sexual Health. 2018 Jan 2;30(1):42-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2017.1404542
  34. Santoso H, Putra PH. Development & evaluation of e-learning module based on visual and global preferences using a user-centered design approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2021 Aug 11;16(15):139-51.
  35. Stieler‐Hunt C, Jones C. A professional development model to facilitate teacher adoption of interactive, immersive digital games for classroom learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019 Jan;50(1):264-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12679
  36. Tinoco-Giraldo H, Torrecilla Sánchez EM, García-Peñalvo FJ. An analysis of lgbtqia+ university students’ perceptions about sexual and gender diversity. Sustainability. 2021 Oct 25;13(21):11786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111786
  37. Tolan PH, McDaniel HL, Richardson M, Arkin N, Augenstern J, DuBois DL. Improving understanding of how mentoring works: Measuring multiple intervention processes. Journal of community psychology. 2020 Aug;48(6):2086-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22408
  38. Wolff JR, Kay TS, Biaggio M, Pantalone DW. Division 44 public comments to the APA commission on accreditation: Promoting equity, accountability, and transparency in doctoral psychology training. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 2021 Dec;8(4):391. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000502

Informações

Palavras-chave

Código QR

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |