Psicólogos en el frente: la atención durante la crisis del Covid-19. De las emociones tóxicas a la salud psicológica

Psicólogos en el frente: la atención durante la crisis del Covid-19. De las emociones tóxicas a la salud psicológica

Published 2021-01-03


https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.21.1.3941.2021
Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP HTML (Spanish) EPUB (Spanish) PDF (marcado) (Spanish) FLIP EPUB (marcado) (Spanish) XML (marcado) (Spanish)
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021): .
Section
Articles on COVID-19
How to Cite
Rodríguez Ceberio, M. . (2021). Psicólogos en el frente: la atención durante la crisis del Covid-19. De las emociones tóxicas a la salud psicológica. Archivos De Medicina (Manizales), 21(1), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.21.1.3941.2021
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.21.1.3941.2021
Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Rodríguez Ceberio, M. . (2021). Psicólogos en el frente: la atención durante la crisis del Covid-19. De las emociones tóxicas a la salud psicológica. Archivos De Medicina (Manizales), 21(1), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.21.1.3941.2021

Download Citation

license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Marcelo Rodríguez Ceberio
Escuela Sistémica Argentina y del laboratorio de investigación en neurociencias y ciencias sociales (LINCS).
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4671-440X ORCID
Show authors biography

Marcelo Rodríguez Ceberio,

Doctor en Psicología (Univ de Barcelona). Director del Doctorado en Psicología (Universidad de Flores), director
de la Escuela Sistémica Argentina y del laboratorio de investigación en neurociencias y ciencias sociales (LINCS).
Buenos Aires, Argentina. 

Objectives: Against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdown, this study aimed to identify the main interventions – ‘facilitators’ – employed by clinical psychologists during the lockdown (4 months). Materials and methods: This is a qualitative study in which a sample of 30 psychotherapists from the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA) was selected, comprising both genders, with 10 to 30 years of clinical experience and from different therapeutic traditions, using non-probabilistic, purposive sampling based on the researcher’s knowledge of the population of professionals under study. Clinical experience was prioritised over age, gender and therapeutic model. They were asked a specific question regarding the main interventions they carried out with their patients at the four-month mark of the lockdown (20 to 30 July 2020), listing and explaining a minimum of five. Results: the facilitators were grouped into categories based on similarities in intervention and explanatory content. Of the 150 obtained, by combining the different ones and discarding the repetitions, 15 were selected. Conclusions: the interventions combine a reflective philosophy of life with concrete actions for change, drawing on common themes such as the perspective of attributing positive meaning to things, people or situations; empowerment and security; avoiding hostile environments; creating and undertaking future projects; improving relationships with one’s social environment; and reducing uncertainty, aggression, distress and anxiety.

Article visits 5078 | PDF visits 175

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Díaz-Pinzón JE. Estudio comparativo entre el contagio durante la cuarentena obligada por el COVID-19 y el contagio durante la apertura gradual y controlada para algunos sectores de la economía en Colombia. Revista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugía. 2020; 29(Supl 1):52-58. DOI: 10.31260/RepertMedCir.01217372.1073
  2. Zhang Y, Yu X, Sun HG, Tick GR, Wei W, Jin B. COVID-19 infection and recovery in various countries: Modeling the dynamics and evaluating the non-pharmaceutical mitigation scenarios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.13901. 2020; 1-29.
  3. Tan CW, Low JG, Wong WH, Chua YY, Goh SL, Ng HJ. Critically ill COVID-19 infected patients exhibit increased clot waveform analysis parameters consistent with hypercoagulability. American journal of hematology. 2020;95(7):E156–E158. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25822
  4. Zhou Z, Ren L, Zhang L, Zhong J, Xiao Y, Jia Z, et al. Heightened innate immune responses in the respiratory tract of COVID-19 patients. Cell Host Microbe. 2020; 27(6):883-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.017
  5. Zheng YY,Ma YT,Zhang JG,Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2020;17(5), 259-260. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5
  6. Sandín B, Valiente RM, García-Escalera J, Chorot P. Impacto psicológico de la pandemia de COVID-19: Efectos negativos y positivos en población española asociados al periodo de confinamiento nacional. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica.2020; 25(1):1-22. DOI: 10.5944/rppc.27569
  7. Ornell F, Schuch JB, Sordi AO, Kessler FH. Pandemia de medo e COVID-19: impacto na saúde mental e possíveis estratégicas. Revista debates in psychiatry. 2020; 2-7.
  8. Parrado-González A, León-Jariego JC. COVID-19: Factores asociados al malestar emocional y morbilidad psíquica en población española. Rev Esp Salud Pública. 2020; 94(8):1-16.
  9. Schmidt B, Crepaldi MA, Azeredo-Bolze SD, Neiva-Silva L, Demenech LM. Impactos na Saúde Mental e Intervenções Psicológicas Diante da Pandemia do Novo Coronavírus (COVID-19). SciELO Preprints.2020; 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.58
  10. Hall RC, Hall RC, Chapman MC. The 1995 Kikwit Ebola outbreak: Lessons hospitals and physicians can apply to future viral epidemics. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008; 30(5):446-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.003
  11. Molero-Jurado MM, Pérez-Puentes MC, Soriano JG, Oropesa-Ruiz NF, Simón MM, Sisto M. Factores psicológicos en situaciones de cuarentena: una revisión sistemática. Eur J Health Research.. 2020; 6(1):109-120. DOI: 10.30552/ejhr.v6i1.206
  12. Jiang X, Deng L, Zhu Y, Ji H, Tao L, Liu L, et al. Psychological crisis intervention during the outbreak period of new coronavirus pneumonia from experience in Shanghai. Psychiatry Research. 2020; 286:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres. 2020.112903
  13. Taylor S. The psychology of pandemics: Preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2019.
  14. Ceberio MR. Los barbijos emocionales. Crisis e impacto psicológico en época del COVID-19. Buenos Aires: Akadia. 2020.
  15. Zandifar A, Badrfam R. Iranian mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic. Asian J Psychiatry. 2020; 51:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101990
  16. Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: Address mental health care to empower society. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10224):e37-e38. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30309-3
  17. Masip P, Aran-Ramspott S, Ruiz-Caballero C, Suau J, Almenar E, Puertas-Graell D. Consumo informativo y cobertura mediática durante el confinamiento por el Covid-19: sobreinformación, sesgo ideológico y sensacionalismo. El profesional de la información. 2020; 29(3):1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.12
  18. Goyal K, Chauhan P, Chhikara K, Gupta P, Singh MP. Fear of COVID 2019: First suicidal case in India. Asian J Psychiatry. 2020; 49:1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101989
  19. Gallegos M, Zalaquett C, Luna-Sánchez SE, Mazo-Zea R, Ortiz-Torres B, Penagos-Corzo JC, et al. Coping with the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic in the Americas: recommendations and guidelines for mental health. Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican J Psychol. 2020 54(1):1-28 .
  20. https://doi.org/10.30849/ripijp.v54i1.1304
  21. Consuegra-Fernández M, Fernandez-Trujillo A. La soledad de los pacientes con COVID-19 al final de sus vidas. Revista de Bioética y Derecho. 2020; 50:81-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2020.50.31683
  22. Diaz-Manchay R, Perez-Loaiza J, Carrasco-Fernandez J, Ñique-Carbajal C. Final de la Vida Humana y COVID 19: Experiencia desgarradora. Revista del Cuerpo Médico del HNAAA. 2020; 13(1):97-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35434/rcmhnaaa.2020.131.631
  23. Organización Iberoamericana de seguridad Social. Recomendaciones de intervención psicológica con pacientes, familiares y profesionales en el contexto de la emergencia sanitaria por COVID-19. OISS Comunicación.Madrid. 2020; 2020:1-5.
  24. American Psychological Association Pandemics. Recuperado em abril 02, 2020, de https://www.apa.org/practice/programs/dmhi/research-information/pandemics
  25. World Health Organization. Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
  26. Universidad de Buenos Aires .Protocolo de atención para la consulta psicológica programada en Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires en el Marco de la pandemia por COVID-19. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicología; 2020.
  27. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J of Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5):1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
  28. Xiao C. A novel approach of consultation on 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)- related psychological and mental problems: Structured letter therapy. Psychiatry Investigation. 2020; 17(2):175-176. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0 2047
  29. Matías-Guiu J, Porta-Etessam J, López-Valdés E, García-Morales I, Guerrero-Solá A, Matías-Guiu JA. La gestión de la asistencia neurológica en tiempos de la pandemia de COVID-19. Neurología. 2020; 35(4):233-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2020.04.001
  30. Barrios V, Cosín-Sales J, Bravo M, Escobar C, Gámez JM, Huelmos A et al. La consulta telemática para el cardiólogo clínico en tiempos de la COVID-19: presente y futuro. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020; 20(10):1-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2020.06.027
  31. Shapiro F. EMDR as an integrative psychotherapy approach: Experts of diverse orientations explore the paradigm prism. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2002.
  32. Shapiro F. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy: Basic principles, protocols, and procedures. 3ª ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 2017.
  33. Ceberio MR, Watzlawick P. Ficciones de la realidad, realidades de la ficción. Barcelona: Paidós; 2008
  34. Haley J. Uncommon Therapy: The psychiatric techniques of Milton Erickson, M D. New York: Norton. 1973.
  35. Montero-Gómez A. Psicopatología del síndrome de estocolmo. Ensayo de un modelo etiológico. Ciencia policial: revista del Instituto de Estudios de Policía. 1999; 51: 51-72.
  36. Ruiz AL, Díaz-Arcaño K, Zaldívar-Pérez D. La psicología como ciencia en el afrontamiento a la COVID-19: apuntes generales. Anales de la Academia de Ciencias de Cuba. 2020; 10(2):1-8.
  37. Enumo SR, Weide JN, Vicentini EC, Araujo MF, Machado WL. Enfrentando o estresse em tempos de pandemia: proposição de uma cartilha. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas). 2020; 37:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202037e200065

Information

Google Scholar Profile

Author Guidelines

Keywords

QR code