Impact of mastoidectomy in the repair of tympanic perforation in patients with chronic non-cholesteatomatous otitis media with sclerotic mastoid bone
Impacto de la mastoidectomia en la reparación de la perforación timpánica en pacientes con otitis media crónica no colesteatomatosa con hueso mastoideo esclerótico
How to Cite
Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Show authors biography
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, Ricardo Rodríguez Pérez , Javier Suarez Argüello , Prevalence and clinical characteristics of idiopathic macular hole in a tertiary hospital in northwest Mexico , Archivos de Medicina : Vol. 24 No. 2 (2024): Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)
- Jorge Humberto Orduño Hernández, Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, Alejandra Quintero Bauman, Rocío Guadalupe Rojas Moreno, Brenda Gissel González Millán, Bernardo Rojo Ochoa, Luc's abscess: Case report and systematic review of the literature , Archivos de Medicina : Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025): Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)
- Jorge Iván Urbina Ruiz, Julio Alberto Ruiz Torres, Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, UROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS IN THE USE OR NOT OF DOUBLE J CATHETER IN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS IN A THIRD LEVEL HOSPITAL , Archivos de Medicina : Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025): Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)
- Karen Paulina Guerrero Paz, Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, Edwin Miguel Canché Martín, Martha Jiménez Rodríguez, Alejandra Quintero Bauman, Postoperative changes in quality of life inpatients with chronic rhinosinusitis withnasal polyps: analysis using SNOT-22 , Archivos de Medicina : Vol. 25 No. 2 (2025): Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)
Objective: to describe the clinical characteristics and results obtained in patients who underwent repair of tympanic perforation secondary to chronic non-cholesteatomatous otitis media with sclerotic mastoid bone, with and without mastoidectomy. Material and methods: comparative cross-sectional study, with a non-probabilistic sampling by consecutive series of cases. We reviewed the files of patients who meet the inclusion criteria in the period from January 2015 to May 2016. Data was collected such as; age, sex, state of origin, history of smoking, cause of perforation, duration of dry ear, data to otoscopy, presence of transoperative and postoperative otorrhea, state of the mucosa, presence of tympanosclerosis or miringoesclerosis, perforation or retraction of the graft. Results: a total of 48 patients were selected; 31 of the female sex and 17 of the male sex, with an average age of 43.25 years, the follow-up was 3 months. When comparing the group of patients with and without mastoidectomy, no statistically significant difference was found in the success of the surgery (graft perforation RR 1.2, p 1, postoperative otorrhea RR 2.26, p 0.68 and graft retraction RR 0.76, p 1). We found that the characteristics during and before surgery did not influence the final result, presenting an overall average of 94% of graft integration. Conclusions: the mastoidectomy shows no additional benefit in tympanic membrane repair, the characteristics during and prior to surgery did not influence the final result.
Article visits 974 | PDF visits 107