FACIAL ANALYSIS AS A TOOL TO DECIDE FUNDAMENTAL RHINOSEPTOPLASTY CONDUCTING IN PATIENTS FUNCTIONAL UNIT RHINOLOGY MILITARY HOSPITAL DR. CARLOS ARVELO
Análisis facial en la rinoseptoplastia funcional. Estudio descriptivo Facial analysis in functional rhinoseptoplasty. Descriptive study
How to Cite
Download Citation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Show authors biography
BACKGROUND: The face is made up of anatomical structures that provide certain facial features. The nose occupies a central position and accurate diagnosis of nasal problems is the most important step and complex functional rhinoseptoplasty. The purpose of the surgical restoration of the nose is to ensure proper operation and provide harmony in the way, so that facial profile angles are relevant in the presurgical evaluation. GENERAL OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of facial profile as a fundamental tool to decide the realization of functional rhinoseptoplasty in patients who come to the Rhinology Unit Otorhinolaryngology Service of the Military Hospital "Dr. Carlos Arvelo ", from January to April 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive - observational cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 25 patients who voluntarily agreed to make photographic studio and Rhinomanometry. RESULTS: Prevalence female with 72% of the total sample. The predominant age group was formed by 92% of young adults. As for the Nasolabial and nasofacial angles, they showed abnormalities 56% and 24% respectively. He underwent Rhinomanometry the population, showing 100% impairment (valvular factor), 80% of whom had nasofacial and modification of Nasolabial angles. DISCUSSION: The correlation between the variation of angles Nasolabial nasofacial and nasal permeability implies that the facial analysis can be considered as a tool in determining aesthetic and functional corrections, explaining the basis of functional rhinoseptoplasty.
Article visits 737 | PDF visits 57
Downloads
- Behrbohm H, Tardy E. Elementos esenciales de la septorrinoplastia: Filosofía-abordajes-técnicas. Bilbao: Librería médica Berri; 2020.
- Chinski H. La nariz ideal. Rev Faso. 2013; 20(2):10-17.
- Galindo N, Galindo J. Rinoplastia básica de la A a la Z. Madrid: Amolca; 2014.
- Ortega-Lara J, Pitanguy I. Rinoplastia. Caracas: Amolca; 2012.
- Miranda N, Gil C, Aponte C, Gómez T, Celis G. Aproximación clínica y quirúrgica a la nariz desviada. Rev Acta Otorrinolaringológica. 2010; 22(1):1-16.
- Miranda N. Rinoplastia abierta vs rinoplastia cerrada: Proposición de flujograma clínico que racionalice la selección del abordaje quirúrgico. Rev Acta Otorrinolaringológica. 2006; 18(2):74-81.
- Burgué-Cedeño J. La Cara, sus proporciones estéticas. La Habana: Clínica Cira García; 2006.1-11.
- Carranza-Valadez H, Pérez-Porras S, García-Pérez MM, Chacón-Martínez H, Chacón-Moreno H, Montemayor-Jáuregui MaC, et al. Definiendo el perfil nasal ideal en la mujer latina. Medicina Universitaria. 2013; 15(61):152-158.
- Alarcón H, Santos J. Perfil facial de pobladores peruanos de la comunidad de los Uros mediante el análisis de Powell. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2008.
- Núñez G, Núñez J. Perfilografía áurea: Estética de las proporciones nasales y faciales. . Cir Plást Iberolatinoam 2019; 45(2):127-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922019000200005
- Blanco-Dávila F. El arte en la medicina: Las proporciones divinas. Rev Ciencia UANL. 2004; 7(2):150-156.
- Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Aesthetic Face. New York: Thieme-Stration, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656047
- Suárez-Nieto C, Gil-Carcedo LM, Algarra JM, Medina JE, Ortega-del Alamo P, Pinedo JT. Tratado de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. Tomo 1. 2° ed. Madrid. Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2007.
- Milo S, Lapter-Vargaand M. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008(30): 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm116
- Stoner M. A photometric analysis of the facial profile. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1955(41):453–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(55)90156-1
- Malkoç S, Demir A, Uysal T, Canbuldu N. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod. 2009. 31:174–179. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjn082
- Ballin A, Carvalho B, Lutaif J, Becker R. et al. Anthropometric study of the caucasian nose in the city of Curitiba: relevance of population evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. 84(4):486-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.004
- Qutub S, Ashraf B, Ghulam I, Mahmood A. Soft tissue analysis of aesthetically pleasing faces.. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2015; 35(3):424-428.
- Sim R, Smith JD, Chan AS. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of Southern Chinese and with women. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 2(2):113-120. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.2.2.113
- Vergara N, Cabezas Y, Granger G, Peña JL. Obstrucción nasal subjetiva y objetiva. Medición mediante Rinometría acústica. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir cab-cuello. 2002; 62: 227-237.
