Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Enfoque y alcance de la revista

Enfoque y alcance de la revista



Abrir | Descargar


Sección
Editorial

Cómo citar
Alvarez Lopez, F. . (2023). Enfoque y alcance de la revista. Archivos De Medicina, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.23.1.4947.2023
Descargar cita

Dimensions
PlumX

Cómo citar

Alvarez Lopez, F. . (2023). Enfoque y alcance de la revista. Archivos De Medicina, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.23.1.4947.2023

Descargar cita

Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Fernando Alvarez-Lopez

La revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales) es una revista de carácter científico adscrita a la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
de la Universidad de Manizales (Manizales, Caldas, Colombia). Su propósito principal es divulgar y discutir los productos académicos
generados por grupos de investigación, semilleros de investigación, investigadores independientes y profesionales en general del área de las Ciencias de la Salud. Publica artículos de investigación científica y de divulgación del conocimiento en temas científicos, sociales, artísticos, relacionados con el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje y el ejercicio profesional en todas las áreas relacionadas con las Ciencias de la Salud.


Visitas del artículo 192 | Visitas PDF 113


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1(1):42–58.
  2. National Library of Medicine. Structured Abstracts. What are structured abstracts? [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022
  3. Dec 2]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/policy/structured_abstracts.html
  4. Patrias K, Wendling D. Citing Medicine. The NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers 2nd edition.
  5. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 2020.
  6. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov;310(20):2191–2194.
  7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24141714/
  8. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting
  9. parallel group randomized trials. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 May;115(5):1063–1070.
  10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20410783
  11. Cuschieri S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr 1;13(Suppl 1):S27–30.
  12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30930716/
  13. Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth .2019 Apr 1;13(Suppl 1):S31–4.
  14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30930717/
  15. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the
  16. Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014
  17. Dec;12(12):1500–1524. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25046751
  18. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles.
  19. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4(1):2–8.
  20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement:
  21. an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372.
  22. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71
  23. Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Urrútia G, Romero-García M, Alonso-Fernández S. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated
  24. guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2021;74(9):790–799.
  25. Kapadia MZ, Askie L, Hartling L, Contopoulos-Ioannidis D, Bhutta ZA, Soll R, et al. PRISMA-Children (C) and
  26. PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct
  27. and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research. BMJ Open. 2016
  28. Apr 18;6(4):e010270. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27091820
  29. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku1 M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ.
  30. ;358:4008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008http://www.bmj.com/
  31. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical
  32. case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;1–4.
  33. Castro-Rodríguez Y. La carta al editor en la publicación científica. Consideraciones para su elaboración.
  34. Odontoestomatologia. 2021 May 17 ;23(37). Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_
  35. arttext&pid=S1688-93392021000101205&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
  36. Süer E, Yaman Ö. How to write an editorial letter? Turk Uroloji Dergisi. 2013;39(SUPPL. 1):41–43.
  37. Animals in NIH Research | grants.nih.gov. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/air/index.htm
  38. EU regulations on animal research | EARA. Available from: https://www.eara.eu/animal-research-law
  39. COPE: Committee on Publication Ethics | Promoting integrity in scholarly research and its publication.
  40. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/
  41. ICMJE | Home [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/
  42. WAME - A global association of editors of peer-reviewed medical journals. Available from: https://www.wame.org/
  43. Feeser VR, Simon JR. The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines.
  44. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008 Oct 1;15(10):963–9.
  45. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00239.x
  46. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 2023 Jan 31;
  47. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36719674/
  48. Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023 Jan 27;379(6630):313–313.
  49. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36701446/
  50. Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023 Jan
  51. ;613(7945):620–1.
  52. Nature. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature.
  53. Jan 26;613(7945):612–612. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36694020/
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |