Editorial

Editorial

---

Article visits 143 | PDF visits 77

---

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

1. MinCiencias. Planes de fortalecimiento de las capacidades institucionales relacionadas con la
2. gestión editorial, la visibilidad y el impacto de las revistas científicas colombiana. 2021. p. 1–14.
3. Open Journal Systems [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 May 30].
4. Available from: https://openjournalsystems.com/
5. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for
6. biomedical publication. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1(1):42–58.
7. National Library of Medicine. Structured Abstracts. What are structured abstracts? 2018.
8. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/policy/structured_abstracts.html
9. Cuschieri S. The CONSORT statement. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr 1;13(Suppl 1):S27–30.
10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30930716/
11. Liu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports
12. for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370.
13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32909959/
14. Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for
15. interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370.
16. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32907797/
17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA
18. statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.
19. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71
20. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku1 M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare
21. interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:4008.
22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008http://www.bmj.com/
23. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.
24. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative
25. review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4(1):2–8.
26. Chen Y, Yang K, Marušić A, Qaseem A, Meerpohl JJ, Flottorp S, et al. A Reporting Tool for Practice
27. Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jan 17;166(2):128–32.
28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27893062/
29. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines
30. for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296.
31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17941714
32. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
33. Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1500–24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25046751
34. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: Consensusbased clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;1–4.
35. Cook DA, Reed DA. Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods: The Medical
36. Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. Academic
37. Medicine. 2015 Aug 31;90(8):1067–76.
38. Lucas NP, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies
39. of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):854–61.
40. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20056381
41. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: A
42. Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011
43. Oct 18;155(8):529. Available from:
44. http://annals.org/article.aspx?doi=10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
45. Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, et al. Reporting Guidelines
46. for Health Care Simulation Research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE Statements.
47. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(8):iii–xiii.
48. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139916300251
49. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications
50. for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 2023 Jan 31;
51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36719674/
52. Generative Pre-trained Transformer C, Zhavoronkov A. Rapamycin in the context of Pascal’s
53. Wager: generative pre-trained transformer perspective. Oncoscience. 2022 Dec 21;9:82–4.
54. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36589923/
55. Generative Pretrained Transformer G, Osmanovic Thunström A, Steingrimsson S, Steingrimsson
56. Can S. Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input? 2022 Jun 21;
57. Available from: https://hal.science/hal-03701250
58. O’Connor S, ChatGPT. Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic
59. progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan 1;66.
60. Turnitin [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: https://www.turnitin.com/solutions/ai-writing
61. Content at Scale. AI Detector [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 6].
62. Available from: https://contentatscale.ai/ai-content-detector/
63. GPTZero [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: https://gptzero.me/