Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Police action with a differential OSIGD approach

Actuación policial con enfoque diferencial OSIGD





Section
Research Articles

How to Cite
Delgado Salazar, S. A., Duarte Amaya, R. Y., & Cely Cáceres, C. M. (2026). Police action with a differential OSIGD approach. Tempus Psicológico, 9(2), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.30554/tempuspsi.9.2.5609.2026
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Delgado Salazar, S. A., Duarte Amaya, R. Y., & Cely Cáceres, C. M. (2026). Police action with a differential OSIGD approach. Tempus Psicológico, 9(2), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.30554/tempuspsi.9.2.5609.2026

Download Citation

Sergio Antonio Delgado Salazar
Ronald Yecid Duarte Amaya
Carlos Manuel Cely Cáceres

Sergio Antonio Delgado Salazar,

.


Ronald Yecid Duarte Amaya,

.


The proposal designed for police action with the OSIGD population in ZAP 1 is based on a very clear problem: microaggressions, stigmas and the lack of specific protocols that deteriorate trust and make many OSIGD people avoid contacting the Police even when they need protection. To understand this situation realistically, the research applied a case study with documentary review, interviews and surveys, which made it possible to listen to both uniformed personnel and citizens and understand how relationships are built (or broken) on a daily basis (Meyer, 2003). All of this was interpreted from a theoretical framework that integrates procedural justice (Tyler, 1990), minority stress, social identity, intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1991) and the COM-B model, which helped translate ideas into simple, human and usable steps for any first responder (Michie, van Stralen, & West, 2011). That is why the proposal is organized into three moments (before, during and after) that seek to reduce small but significant errors.    

Article visits 0 | PDF visits 0


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  2. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014/2018). Metodología de la investigación (x.ª ed.). McGraw‑Hill.
  3. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street‑level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
  4. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
  5. Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42.
  6. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
  7. Tamayo y Tamayo, M. (2012). El proceso de la investigación científica (x.ª ed.). Limusa.
  8. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton University Press.