Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Modulators of enjoyment (Gaudiebility) in hypertensive vs normotensive participants

Moduladores del disfrute (Gaudibilidad) en hipertensos vs normotensos




Section
Artículos de Investigación

How to Cite
Padrós Blázquez, F. ., Sierra Jiménez, E. ., & Martínez Medina, M. P. . (2019). Modulators of enjoyment (Gaudiebility) in hypertensive vs normotensive participants. Archivos De Medicina , 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.19.2.3299.2019
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Padrós Blázquez, F. ., Sierra Jiménez, E. ., & Martínez Medina, M. P. . (2019). Modulators of enjoyment (Gaudiebility) in hypertensive vs normotensive participants. Archivos De Medicina , 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.19.2.3299.2019

Download Citation

Ferran Padrós Blázquez
María Patricia Martínez Medina

María Patricia Martínez Medina,

Maestra en Ciencias; Hospital Civil “Dr Miguel Silva”. Morelia, México.


Objective: to compare the levels of gaudiebility (modulators of enjoyment) between hypertensive and normotensive participants, controlling some sociodemographic, likewise to study the possible relationship between gaudiebility (modulators of enjoyment) and arterial hypertension. Material and methods: in the present paper, a sample of 306 adults was used (mean age 58,81, 87,3% were female, most of them stated to be married (55,9%) and with an average of years of schooling. of 6,87), divided into two groups (hypertensive n = 153 and normotensive n = 153) matched by sex, age, marital status and schooling. The Padrós gaudiebility scale was applied to groups. Results: the results show a mean in the total score of the gaudiebility scale of 58,14 (SD = 12,17) in the hypertensive group, although it did not result significantly (t (304) = -1,755; p = 0,080) lower than the obtained in the normotensive sample 60,69 (SD = 13,22), but negative and significant correlation was observed with the systolic blood pressure (r = -0,275, p = 0,002) and with the diastolic (r = -0,241; p = 0,006). Conclusions: the inconclusive results suggest study in greater depth the relationship between both variables. The main limitation is that the type of treatment and possible side effects were not controlled.


Article visits 705 | PDF visits 52


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |