Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Symmetrical descents: Mechanisms of self-annulment and disconfirmation in pursuit of relational preservation

Descensos simétricos: Mecanismos de anulación del self y desconfirmación en pos de la conservación relacional




Section
Artículos de Reflexión no derivados de investigación

How to Cite
Rodríguez Ceberio, M., & Cócola, F. (2025). Symmetrical descents: Mechanisms of self-annulment and disconfirmation in pursuit of relational preservation. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5254.2025
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Rodríguez Ceberio, M., & Cócola, F. (2025). Symmetrical descents: Mechanisms of self-annulment and disconfirmation in pursuit of relational preservation. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5254.2025

Download Citation

Marcelo R. Ceberio
Facundo Cócola

Marcelo R. Ceberio,

Academic Director of the Argentine Systemic School. Director of the PhD in Psychology at the University of Flores. Director of the Laboratory of Research in Neurosciences and Social Sciences (LINCS). President of the European and Latin American Network of Systemic Schools (RELATES).


Facundo Cócola,

Coordinator of the Provincial Addiction Prevention Plan for the Ministry of Health of Mendoza, Argentina. Director of the Space for Itinerant Practices in Systemic Studies (Espacio PIES).


Human communication theory has identified dysfunctional interaction patterns, such as the symmetrical escalation, characterized by an increase in hostility in a reciprocal and competitive attempt to outdo the other in the conversation. This article introduces a new concept: symmetrical descents. This pattern is distinguished by the systematic avoidance of conflict, a growing emotional disconnection, and a decrease in relational vitality, leading to the mutual suppression of individualities to preserve the relationship. While in escalation, both partners seek to position themselves hierarchically above the other through disqualifications, generating an intense and negative emotional climate, in descent, both avoid confrontation, placing themselves in lower positions through disconfirming and self-nullifying exchanges, in a cold and distant emotional context. Events of energies contrary to the descending ones can interrupt the pattern, creating conditions for systemic change, either leading to dissolution or restructuring. In couples therapy for symmetrical descent, the focus is on addressing the emotional needs of both partners, adapting to their attachment orientations. On a relational level, it is crucial to identify and communicate the pattern, and to build a secure base to foster open, complementary, and flexible communication. 


Article visits 211 | PDF visits 111


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. 1. Watzlawick P, Beavin JH, Jackson DD. Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Faber & Faber; 1967.
  2. 2. Bateson G. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books; 1972. Versión cast. (1976). Pasos hacia una ecología de la mente. Buenos Aires: Carlos Lohlé.
  3. 3. Linares JL, Campo C. Tras la honorable fachada: Los trastornos depresivos desde una perspectiva relacional. Barcelona: Grupo Planeta; 2000.
  4. 4. Bowlby J. A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
  5. 5. Barudy J, Dantagnan M. Los buenos tratos a la infancia: Parentalidad, apego y resiliencia. Barcelona: Gedisa; 2005.
  6. 6. Fonagy P, Target M. Psychic reality in psychoanalysis: Understanding the mental life of the self. London: Routledge; 2003.
  7. 7. Ehrenberg MF, Hunter MA, Elterman MF. Attachment patterns in a sample of children and adolescents referred for anxiety disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 1996;41(9):617-26. doi:10.1177/070674379604100907
  8. 8. Schore AN. Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2003.
  9. 9. Johnson SM, Greenberg LS. Emotionally focused therapy: An overview. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 1987;24(3):552-60. doi:10.1037/h0085753
  10. 10. Whisman MA. Depression and marital distress: An integrative review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(3):363-73. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.363
  11. 11. Minuchin S, Rosman BL, Baker L. Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.
  12. 12. Gottman JM, Levenson RW. The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62(3):737-45. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
  13. 13. Shneidman ES. The suicidal mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  14. 14. Joiner TE. Why people die by suicide. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2005.
  15. 15. Ceberio MR. Qué digo cuando digo: De los malentendidos a la buena comunicación. Buenos Aires: Ediciones B; 2019.
  16. 16. Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1974.
  17. 17. Markman HJ, Stanley SM, Blumberg SL. Fighting for your marriage: A deluxe revised edition of the classic best-seller for enhancing marriage and preventing divorce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
  18. 18. Gable SL, Reis HT. Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;42:195-257. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42004-3
  19. 19. Johnson MD, Galambos NL, Finn C, Neyer FJ, Horne RM. Pathways between self-esteem and depressive symptoms from late adolescence to midlife. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017;113(1):116-32. doi:10.1037/pspp0000133
  20. 20. Ceberio M. Hacia el trastorno de alienación conyugal o la simbiosis descalificatoria. Redes. 2014;31:1-36.
  21. 21. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Pereg D. Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motiv Emot. 2003;27(2):77-102. doi:10.1023/A:1024515519160
  22. 22. Johnson SM. The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2004
  23. 23. Kreuz A. What if there is another person in his/her life? Infidelity in couple therapy. In: Pereira R, Linares JL, editors. Clinical interventions in systemic couple and family therapy. Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 87-101. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78521-9_7
  24. 24. Campo C, Ramo M. Terapia de pareja e infidelidad. Un modelo de diagnóstico relacional e intervención terapéutica desde la perspectiva sistémica. Madrid: Ediciones Morata; 2022.
  25. 25. Keizer R, Schenk N. Becoming a parent and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal dyadic perspective. J Marriage Fam. 2012;74(4):759-73. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00991.x
  26. 26. Kluwer ES. From partnership to parenthood: A review of marital change across the transition to parenthood. J Fam Theory Rev. 2010;2(2):105-25. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00045.x
  27. 27. Rolland JS. Mastering family challenges in serious illness and disability. In: Stanton MP, Bray JH, editors. Family psychology: Science-based interventions. New Jersey: Wiley; 2012. p. 457-84.
  28. 28. Boss PG. Ambiguous loss: working with families of the missing. Fam Process. 2002;41(1):14-28. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000014.x
  29. 29. Walsh F. Strengthening family resilience. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
  30. 30. Arriaga XB, Mahan ER. Attachment insecurity and perceived importance of relational features. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 2017;34(4):446-66. doi:10.1177/0265407516640604
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |