Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Technologies for the Diagnosis of Radiodermatitis: a Systematic Review

Tecnologias para o Diagnóstico da Radiodermite: uma Revisão Sistemática Tecnologías para el diagnóstico de radiodermatitis: una revisión sistemática




Section
Artículos de Investigación

How to Cite
Iede Shiguihara, D. S. ., Brandão Oselame, G. ., & Borba Neves, E. . (2020). Technologies for the Diagnosis of Radiodermatitis: a Systematic Review: Tecnologías para el diagnóstico de radiodermatitis: una revisión sistemática. Archivos De Medicina , 20(2), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.20.2.3706.
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Iede Shiguihara, D. S. ., Brandão Oselame, G. ., & Borba Neves, E. . (2020). Technologies for the Diagnosis of Radiodermatitis: a Systematic Review: Tecnologías para el diagnóstico de radiodermatitis: una revisión sistemática. Archivos De Medicina , 20(2), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.20.2.3706.

Download Citation

Dryelle Soster Iede Shiguihara
Gleidson Brandão Oselame
Eduardo Borba Neves

Dryelle Soster Iede Shiguihara,

MSc, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. Curitiba, Brasil. ORCID: 


Gleidson Brandão Oselame,

MSc, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. Curitiba, Brasil. ORCID: 


Eduardo Borba Neves,

PhD. Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná. Curitiba, Brasil. 


Most read articles by the same author(s)

Objective: radiodermatitis or radiodermatitis is an inflammatory cell reaction triggered by radiotherapy, which is one of the alternatives for the treatment of various types of cancers. The objective of this work was to analyze the main diagnostic methods of radiodermatitis with the use of technological tools, regarding the equipment used, the form of clinical analysis, parameters developed and the final product. Materials and methods: a systematic review with an exploratory nature and a qualitative approach was performed. The search for studies in international journals was carried out in July 2019, in the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. The descriptors "radiodermatitis" and "acute radiation dermatitis" were used for the search. The inclusion criteria were: article, written in English, published in the last ten years (01/2009 to 07/2019), and content related to the diagnosis of radiodermatitis caused by radiotherapy of exclusive application. Results: This review found studies on the following technological tools: cytological assessment, blood flow assessment, machine learning, photographic scale, thermal image, irradiation dose, and spectrophotometry. The use of photographic and thermal images has been consolidated as an important diagnostic tool in the medical field. These technological tools have been shown to be applicable to the diagnosis of radiodermatitis, with its effect enhanced by digital image processing and artificial intelligence algorithms.Conclusions: The analysis described here demonstrates the need for technological development to outline and standardize the radiodermatitis diagnostic process, which would allow early treatment and maintenance of the individual's engagement in antineoplastic therapy.


Article visits 848 | PDF visits 57


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Oselame GB, Sanches IJ, Kuntze A, Neves EB. Software for automatic diagnostic prediction of skin clinical images based on ABCD rule. Biosci J 2017; 33(4):1065-1078. DOI: 10.14393/BJ-v33n4a2017-34738
  2. Sekiguchi K, Akahane K, Ogita M, Haga C, Ito R, Arai S, et al. Efficacy of heparinoid moisturizer as a prophylactic agent for radiation dermatitis following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2018; 48(5):450-457. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy045
  3. Lee TF, Sung KC, Chao PJ, Huang YJ, Lan JH, Wu HY, et al. Relationships among patient characteristics, irradiation treatment planning parameters, and treatment toxicity of acute radiation dermatitis after breast hybrid intensity modulation radiation therapy. PloS one 2018; 13(7):e0200192. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200192
  4. Beamer LC, Grant M. Longitudinal trends in skin-related and global quality of life among women with breast radiodermatitis: a pilot study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 33:22-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.008
  5. Lilla C, Ambrosone CB, Kropp S, Helmbold I, Schmezer P, von Fournier D, et al. Predictive factors for late normal tissue complications following radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 106(1):143-150. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9480-9
  6. Reddy J, Lindsay W, Berlind C, Ahern C, Smith B. Applying a Machine Learning Approach to Predict Acute Toxicities During Radiation for Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102(3):S59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.167
  7. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):529-536. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  8. Maillot O, Leduc N, Atallah V, Escarmant P, Petit A, Belhomme S, et al. Evaluation of acute skin toxicity of breast radiotherapy using thermography: results of a prospective single-centre trial. Cancer Radiother 2018;22(3):205-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.10.007
  9. Partl R, Jonko B, Schnidar S, Schöllhammer M, Bauer M, Singh S, et al. 128 SHADES OF RED: Objective Remote Assessment of Radiation Dermatitis by Augmented Digital Skin Imaging. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 236:363-374. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-759-7-363
  10. Sun LM, Huang CJ, Chen HY, Chang GH, Tsao MJ. Evaluating the consistency of location of the most severe acute skin reaction and highest skin dose measured by thermoluminescent dosimeter during radiotherapy for breast cancer. Med Dos 2016; 41(3):216-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.02.002
  11. González-Sanchis A, Brualla-González L, Sanchez-Carazo JL, Gordo-Partearroyo JC, Esteve-Martínez A,Vicedo-González A, et al. Evaluation of acute skin toxicity in breast radiotherapy with a new quantitative approach. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122(1):54-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.019
  12. Huang CJ, Hou MF, Luo KH, Wei SY, Huang MY, Su SJ, et al. RTOG, CTCAE and WHO criteria for acute radiation dermatitis correlate with cutaneous blood flow measurements. Breast J 2015; 24(3):230-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.01.008
  13. Shumway D, Kapdia N, Do T, Griffith K, Feng M, Jagsi R, et al. Development of a photonumeric scale for acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90(1):S238. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.847
  14. Vano‐Galvan S, Fernandez‐Lizarbe E, Truchuelo M, Diaz‐Ley B, Grillo E, Sanchez V, et al. Dynamic skin changes of acute radiation dermatitis revealed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013;27(9):1143-1150. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04680.x
  15. Yoshikawa N, Inomata T, Shimbo T, Takahashi M, Uesugi Y, Juri H, et al. Appropriate evaluation of and risk factors for radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients receiving hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery. Breast cancer. 2014; 21(2):170-176. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0366-x
  16. Graham PH, Plant NA, Graham JL, Browne LH, Borg M, Capp A, et al. Digital photography as source documentation of skin toxicity: An analysis from the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 04.01 Post‐Mastectomy Radiation Skin Care Trial. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012; 56(4):458-463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02365.x
  17. Lucey P, Zouzias C, Franco L, Chennupati SK, Kalnicki S, McLellan BN. Practice patterns for the prophylaxis and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis in the United States. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25(9):2857-2862. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3701-0
  18. Silva-De Andrade KB, Lima-Francz AC, Dos Santos-Grellmann M, Cortez-Belchior P, Araújo-De Oliveira J, Do Nascimento-Wassita D. Consulta de enfermagem: avaliação da adesão ao autocuidado dos pacientes submetidos à radioterapia. Rev enferm UERJ 2014;22(5):622-8. DOI: 10.12957/reuerj.2014.11227
  19. Capitani G, Sehnem E, Rosa C, Matos F, Reis VM, Neves EB. Osgood-schlatter Disease Diagnosis by Algometry and Infrared Thermography. Open Sports Sci J 2017; 10(2):223-228. DOI: 10.2174/1875399X01710010223
  20. Neves EB, Moreira TR, Lemos R, Vilaça-Alves J, Rosa C, Reis VM. Using skin temperature and muscle thickness to assess muscle response to strength training. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2015;21(5):350-4. DOI: 10.1590/1517-869220152105151293
  21. Mendes R, Sousa N, Almeida A, Vilaça-Alves J, Reis VM, Neves EB. Thermography: a technique for assessing the risk of developing diabetic foot disorders. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91(1079):538. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133441
  22. Neves EB, Vilaça-Alves J, Rosa C, Reis VM. Thermography in neurologic practice. Open Neurol J 2015; 9(1):24-27. DOI: 10.2174/1874205X01509010024
  23. Perin A, Ulbricht L, Neves EB. Contribuição dos Diferentes Seguimentos Corporais no Teste de Sentar e Alcançar. Motri 2015; 11(2):153-162. DOI: 10.6063/motricidade.6006
  24. Perin A, Ulbricht L, Ricieri DD, Neves EB. Utilização da biofotogrametria para a avaliação da flexibilidade de tronco. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2012; 18(3):176-180. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-86922012000300008
  25. Magas V, de Souza MA, Neves EB, Nohama P. Evaluation of thermal imaging for the diagnosis of repetitive strain injuries of the wrist and hand joints. Res Biomed Eng 2019;35(1):57-64. DOI: 10.1007/s42600-019-00009-y
  26. Bandeira F, Neves EB, Moura MA, Nohama P. The thermography in support for diagnosis of muscle injury in sport. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2014; 20(1):59-64. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-86922014000100012
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |