Peer Review Process
The Editorial Board of the journal Tempus Psicológico retains the ultimate authority regarding the acceptance or rejection of all submitted manuscripts. This determination is strictly informed by the independent evaluation reports provided by at least two external, double-blind peer reviewers specialized in the manuscript's specific field of expertise. All editorial decisions are formally and promptly communicated to the authors.
In the event of a rejection, the editorial workflow for the manuscript ceases immediately. Upon notification of rejection, any exclusivity agreement or commitment between the authors and the journal regarding the manuscript is automatically terminated, allowing authors to freely submit their research to alternative scientific publications. Conversely, when revision is recommended, the editorial team will provide comprehensive feedback detailing the mandatory or suggested adjustments required to make publication possible. To guarantee scientific integrity, all submitted manuscripts—including those requested for thematic or special issues—must undergo the full double-blind peer-review workflow without exception.
To provide a transparent operation, the journal strictly enforces the following turnaround times for each phase of the evaluation workflow: