Desarrollo de Instrumentos de Evaluación Psicológica y Educativa desde el modelo B.E.A.R (Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research)
Development of psychological and educational assessment instruments based on the B.E.A.R. (Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research) model
Cómo citar
Descargar cita
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Se presenta el modelo BEAR (Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research) de diseño de instrumentos de medición y sus componentes con base a la lectura de la segunda edición del libro de Mark Wilson (2023), de la Universidad de Berkley. Se enfatiza el modelo por sus facilidades al unir los conceptos teóricos con el modelo psicométrico de medición y las posibilidades que representa para el diseño de instrumentos apropiados generando inferencias correctas cuando se trata de recolectar evidencia sobre los rasgos psicológicos, comportamentales, actitudinales y de habilidad. Se discute los pasos del proceso y se presentan interrogantes sobre las potencialidades del modelo fuera del supuesto de la Unidimensionalidad. Palabras clave: Psicometría, Modelo BEAR, mapa de Wright, IRT, modelo de Rasch, Construcción de instrumentos, Independencia local.
Visitas del artículo 58 | Visitas PDF 37
Descargas
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals (Vol. Handbook I: Cognitive domain). New York: Davidson.
- Ferrara, S., Lai, E., Reilly, A., & Nichols, P. D. (2016). Principled approaches to assessment design, development, and implementation. In A. A. Rupp & J. P. Leighton (Eds.), The Handbook of Cognition and Assessment: Frameworks, Methodologies, and Applications, pp. 41–74. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118956588.ch3
- Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164.
- Hontagas, P., Ponsoda,V., Olea, J., Revuelta, J. (1998). Representación de funciones características de ítems dicotómicos y politómicos”. Psicothema, no 10(1998): 475-479. https://www.psicothema.com/contenido?num=19981002
- Irribara, D. (2022) A Pragmatic Perspective of Measurement. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-74025-2
- Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David Mckay Company Incorporated.
- Masters, Geoff. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47, (1982):149-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296272
- McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100–117.
- Mari, L., Wilson, M., & Maul, A. (2023). Measurement Across the Sciences: Developing a Shared Concept System for Measurement (second edition). New York: Springer.
- Mislevy, R. (2018). Sociocultural Foundations of Educational Measurement. New York: Routledge
- National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (Committee on the foundations of assessment). In J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky & R. Glaser (Eds.), Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- White, D.K., Wilson, J.C. and Keysor, J.J. (2011), Measures of adult general functional status: SF-36 Physical Functioning Subscale (PF-10), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Osteoarthritis-Function-Computer Adaptive Test (OA-Function-CAT). Arthritis Care Research, 63: S297-S307. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20638
- Reise, S., & Revicki, A. (2015) Handbook of IRT Modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment. Routledge.
- Wilson, M (2005) Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach, 1st Edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. NYC
- Wilson, M (2023) Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach, 2nd Edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, second. NYC
- Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (two thousand). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 181–208.
- Wilson, M., & Tan, S. (2023). Test development: Principled assessment design. In D. Mc Caffrey & A. Rupp (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (fourth edition), Volume 10: Quantitative Research/Educational Measurement (pp. 146–162). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
Información
