Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Therapeutic failure of denosumab in a nonagenarianpatient with postmenopausal osteoporosis: casereport and critical review of the literature

Fallo terapéutico a denosumab en unapaciente nonagenaria con osteoporosisposmenopáusica: reporte de casoy revisión crítica de la literatura



Open | Download


Section
Artículos de Reportes de Caso

How to Cite
García Henao, L. M. ., Castro Osorio, E. E. ., & Hoyos Llanos, D. M. (2025). Therapeutic failure of denosumab in a nonagenarianpatient with postmenopausal osteoporosis: casereport and critical review of the literature. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5324.2025
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

García Henao, L. M. ., Castro Osorio, E. E. ., & Hoyos Llanos, D. M. (2025). Therapeutic failure of denosumab in a nonagenarianpatient with postmenopausal osteoporosis: casereport and critical review of the literature. Archivos De Medicina , 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.25.1.5324.2025

Download Citation

Laura María García Henao
Edgar Eduardo Castro Osorio
Diana Marcela Hoyos Llanos

Edgar Eduardo Castro Osorio,

Internal medicine specialist and geriatrician

SES Hospital Universitario de Caldas

Docente Universidad de Manizales


Diana Marcela Hoyos Llanos,

Medica especialista en Medicina Interna


Most read articles by the same author(s)

Introduction: denosumab is an antiresorptive agent widely used in postmenopausal
osteoporosis. Its efficacy in very elderly patients is not well established. Clinical case: a
93-year-old woman with osteoporosis and a history of fractures treated with denosumab
for 2 years with good adherence and a biochemical profile at target levels presented a
new vertebral fracture and a significant decrease in femoral neck BMD. Discussion:
the possibility of therapeutic failure in an adherent patient is discussed, likely related
to accumulated microstructural damage or late initiation of treatment. Clinical, pharmacological, and follow-up implications are reviewed. Conclusion: treatment failure is a
real and underdiagnosed entity. Periodic densitometric monitoring is essential, and a
change in therapeutic strategy should be considered in high-risk cases.


Article visits 91 | PDF visits 108


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. 1. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwiński E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):513-523. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9
  2. 2. Di Lorenzo L. Denosumab in elderly osteoporotic patients. A narrative review. Clin Ter. 2023;174(6):545-549. doi: 10.7417/CT.2023.5023.
  3. 3. Gu Z, Yang X, Wang Y, Gao J. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hemodial Int. 2023;27(4):352-363. doi: 10.1111/hdi.13098
  4. 4. Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Steger GG, Egle D, Greil R, Fitzal F, et al. Adjuvant denosumab in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ABCSG-18): disease-free survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30862-3.
  5. 5. Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Morin SN, Lix LM. Change in Bone Mineral Density Is an Indicator of Treatment-Related Antifracture Effect in Routine Clinical Practice: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(7):465-472. doi: 10.7326/M15-2937.
  6. 6. Pérez Edo L. La inhibición del RANKL en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis: denosumab. Semin Fund Esp Reumatol. 2011;12(1):27-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.semreu.2010.11.003
  7. 7. Sosa-Henríquez M, Torregrosa O, Déniz A, Saavedra P, Ortego N, Turrión A, Pérez Castrillón JL, Díaz-Curiel M, Gómez-Alonso C, Martínez G, Antonio Blázquez J, Olmos-Martínez JM, Etxebarria Í, Caeiro JR, Mora-Peña D. Multiple vertebral fractures after suspension of denosumab. A series of 56 cases. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(10):e14550. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14550.
  8. 8. Fernández Fernandez E, Núñez Benavent D, Bonilla Hernán G, Monjo Henry I, García Carazo S, et Al. Fracturas vertebrales múltiples tras la suspensión de tratamiento con denosumab: serie de diez casos. Reu Clin. 2020;16(6):480-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.11.002
  9. 9. Jones AR, Sim IW. Denosumab failure associated with escape from suppression of bone resorption. Bone. 2020; 131:115157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.115157
  10. 10. Adult Official positions of the ISCD. Middletown, CT 06457 USA. Since 2019. Updated in 2023. https://iscd.org/official-positions-2023/
  11. 11. Hlaing TT, Compston JE. Biochemical markers of bone turnover - uses and limitations. Ann Clin Biochem. 2014;51(Pt 2):189-202. doi: 10.1177/0004563213515190.
  12. 12. Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Diab DL, Eldeiry LS, Farooki A, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists/american college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(Suppl 1):1-46. doi: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL.
  13. 13. Langdahl BL. Overview of treatment approaches to osteoporosis. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(9):1891-1906. doi: 10.1111/bph.15024.
  14. 14. Tu KN, Lie JD, Wan CKV, Cameron M, Austel AG, Nguyen JK, Van K, Hyun D. Osteoporosis: A Review of Treatment Options. P T. 2018;43(2):92-104. PMID: 29386866; PMCID: PMC5768298.
  15. 15. Raje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, Shimizu K, García-Sanz R, Durie B, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. marzo de 2018;19(3):370-81. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30072-X.
  16. 16. Thongprayoon C, Acharya P, Acharya C, Chenbhanich J, Bathini T, Boonpheng B, et al. Hypocalcemia and bone mineral density changes following denosumab treatment in end-stage renal disease patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(8):1737-1745. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4533-6.
  17. 17. Schini M, Gossiel F, Saini T, Banda P, Ward R, Vilaca T, et al. The effects of denosumab on osteoclast precursors in postmenopausal women: a possible explanation for the overshoot phenomenon after discontinuation. J Bone Miner Res. 2024:zjae170. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae170.
  18. 18. Martínez-Reina J, Calvo-Gallego JL, Pivonka P. Combined Effects of Exercise and Denosumab Treatment on Local Failure in Post-menopausal Osteoporosis-Insights from Bone Remodelling Simulations Accounting for Mineralisation and Damage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:635056. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.635056.
  19. 19. Yong EL, Logan S. Menopausal osteoporosis: screening, prevention and treatment. Singapore Med J. 2021;62(4):159–166. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021036.
  20. 20. Díez-Pérez A, Olmos JM, Nogués X, Sosa M, Díaz-Curiel M, Pérez-Castrillón JL, et al. Risk factors for prediction of inadequate response to antiresorptives. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(4):817-24. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1496.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |