Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Contributions in the social and environmental dimension to floriculture in the hydrangea sector under a life-cycle analysis approach

Aportes en la dimensión social y ambiental a la floricultura en el sector de hortensias bajo un enfoque de análisis de ciclo de vida




Section
Artículo de investigación científica

How to Cite
González Bedoya, M. A., Betancur Vélez, M. . ., Arenas Echeverri, C. N., & Ríos Arango, J. A. . (2024). Contributions in the social and environmental dimension to floriculture in the hydrangea sector under a life-cycle analysis approach. Lúmina, 25(1), E0049. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4721.2024
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

González Bedoya, M. A., Betancur Vélez, M. . ., Arenas Echeverri, C. N., & Ríos Arango, J. A. . (2024). Contributions in the social and environmental dimension to floriculture in the hydrangea sector under a life-cycle analysis approach. Lúmina, 25(1), E0049. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4721.2024

Download Citation

María Alejandra González Bedoya
Mailuz Betancur Vélez
Cindy Natalia Arenas Echeverri
José Adrián Ríos Arango

Most read articles by the same author(s)

The Colombian flower industry has been growing and consolidating itself as one of the main economic activities in the country. This activity generates significant environmental and social impacts throughout its life cycle that must be resolved in order to consolidate itself as a sustainable economic activity, and for this reason the project "Environmental, economic and social life cycle assessment for hydrangea agro-industrial companies as a strategy for sustainable development in the Province of La Paz in eastern Antioquia, Colombia" is being developed for small and medium-sized producers' crops to trigger impacts and externalities in the production process. The methodology used in the project was based on the series of ISO 14040 and 14044 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and UNEP standards, which were evidenced in the production process of hydrangeas for export in a small farm. Some of the significant results of the research allowed identifying that the cultivation stage has grater influence on the categories of environmental impacts and social indicators evaluated, thus achieving the consolidation of relevant actions to improve the performance of the crops from a sustainability perspective.


Article visits 302 | PDF visits 197


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abeliotis, K., Detsis, V. & Pappia, C. (2013). Life cycle assessment of bean production in the Prespa National Park, Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production 41. 89-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.032
  2. Abeliotis, K., Barla, S., Detsis, V. & Malindretos, G. (2016). Life cycle assessment of carnation production in Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production 112. 32-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.018
  3. Aguirre-López, M., Alzate, J. & Cano, N. (2017). Evaluación de la carga ambiental asociada a un cultivo de hortensias en La Ceja del Tambo (Antioquia-Colombia) mediante el Análisis de Ciclo de Vida. Gestión y Ambiente 20 (2), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v20n2.65138
  4. Alvarado-Camarillo, D., Valdez-Aguilar, L., Castillo-González, A., Trejo-Téllez, L. & Martínez-Amador, S. (2018). Biomass, nitrogen and potassium dynamics in hydroponic rose production. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B- Soil & Plant Sicence 68, 719-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1473481
  5. Arcese, G., Lucchetti, M.C. & Massa, I. (2017). Modeling Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for the Italian wine sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 1027-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.137
  6. Baumann H. & Tillman A. (2004). Thehitchhiker's guide to LCA: anorientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  7. Centro de Producción Más Limpia (2018). Identificación y priorización de partes interesadas. En proceso de asesoraría a la Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
  8. Cerutti, A.K., Beccaro, G.L., Bruun, S., Bosco, S., Donno, D., Notarnicola, B. & Bounous, G. (2014). Life cycle assessment application in the fruit sector: state of the art and recommendations for environmental declarations of fruit products. Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.017
  9. Costa, D., Quinterio, P., Pereira, V. & Dias, A. (2022). Social life cycle assessment based on input-output analysis of the Portuguese pulp and paper sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 330, 129851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129851
  10. Global Reporting Initiative- GRI (2013). Sustainability reporting guidelines. G4. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Global Reporting Initiative.
  11. Hauschild, M. (2005). Assessing Environmental Impacts in a Life-Cycle Perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 39 (4), 81A-88A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es053190s
  12. Jørgensen, A., Le Bocq, A., Nazarkina, L., & Hausichild, M. (2008). Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.11.367
  13. ISO 14044:2006 (2006): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
  14. Lagarde, V. & Macombe, C. (2013). Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Handle. 10.1007/s11367-012-0448-1
  15. Lan, Y., Tam, W., Xing, W., Datt, R. & Chan, Z. (2022). Life cycle environmental impacts of cut flowers: a review. Journal Cleaner Production 368, 133415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133415
  16. Ministerio de agricultura (15 de mayo de 2020). El sector agropecuario creció 6,8% e impulsó la economía colombiana en el primer trimestre de 2020. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/noticias/Paginas/El-sector-agropecuario- creci%C3%B3-6,8-e-impuls%C3%B3-la-econom%C3%ADa-colombiana-en-el- primer-trimestre-de-2020-.aspx (Consultado el 15 de enero de 2022).
  17. Ministerio de Comercio, Industria y Turismo (05 de agosto de 2021). Noticia de Comercio. Exportaciones de bienes no minero energéticos alcanzaron valor más alto para un primer semestre desde 2013. https://www.mincit.gov.co/prensa/noticias/comercio/exportaciones-bienes-no-minero-energeticos-crece. (Consultado el 15 de octubre de 2021).
  18. Parrado-Moreno, C., Ricardo-Hernández, R., Velázquez-Arredondo, H. & Lopera-Castro, S. (2019). An Environmental Evaluation of the Cut-Flower Supply Chain (Dendranthema grandiflora) Through a Life Cycle Assessment. Revista EIA 16 (31), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.24050/reia.v16i31.747
  19. Ramirez, P.K.S., Petti, L., Haberland, N.T. & Ugaya, C.M.L. (2014). Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19, 1515-1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0761-y
  20. Russo, G., Buttol, P. & Tarantini, M. (2008). LCA (Life cycle assessment) of roses and cyclamens in greenhouse cultivations. ISHS acta horticulture. In: IS on Greensys 2007, 359-366. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.801.37
  21. Sahle, A. & Potting, J. (2013). Environmental life cycle assessment of Ethiopian rose cultivation. Science of The Total Environment 443 (15), 163-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.048
  22. Souza, D.M., Teixeira, R.F.M. & Ostermann, O.P. (2015). Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assessment: are we there yet? Global Change Biology 21 (1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0761-y
  23. UNEP/SETAC (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris.
  24. UNEP/SETAC (2013). Methodological Sheets of Sub-categories of Impact for a Social LCA. GreenDelta, Chalmers University and UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Sweden.
  25. Vilches, A., Garcia-Martinez, A., Sanchez-Montañes, B. (2017). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings 135, 286-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.04
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |