Peer Review Process

  • The editorial coordination of Plumilla Educativa Journal makes a plural and extensive call for the presentation of articles, from which those who participate can send it at any time.
  • Received an article, the editorial coordination of Plumilla Educativa informs the author or authors of the reception.
  • A review is made by the editor if it applies to the conditions, approaches, scope set forth by the journal and if it meets the minimum conditions to continue the process.
  • The article is reviewed if it has not been previously published supported by the software Turnitin, CopySpider, Plagium or other software available for these searches. Once this is done, it is adjusted to be sent to two reading pairs, the title of the article is left without information from the authors.
  • Once this is done, it is adjusted to be sent to two reading pairs, the title of the article is left without information from the authors.
  • The evaluators are chosen carefully according to their discipline and specific knowledge required by the document presented.
  • The peer reviewers of the journal are external to the university of Manizales. 
  • The evaluation process is double blind. Each article has at least two peer evaluations, as already stated, in the double-blind condition.
  • The evaluators are chosen with care according to their discipline and specific knowledge that the presented document demands. The evaluating peers have 6 weeks to submit their assessment; The writers have 6 weeks to make the adjustments, from that moment the Plumilla Educativa Journal has about 6 weeks to publish it. If the process is not altered, the article is published in 18 weeks.
  • Once the evaluation is reviewed, the acceptance or rejection is defined.
  • Depending on the determination, editorial coordination proceeds to:
    1. Communicate to the author or authors the acceptance of the article and initiate the processing of the text for its publication.
    2. In case of rejection, the author or authors are informed of the criteria set forth by the peer evaluators -double blind- who do not allow the publication of the article.
    3. When the peer evaluators -double blind- give the concept that an article can be published, however, it is necessary to adapt it, the coordination sends the format to the author without the data of the evaluator so that the appropriate adjustments are made.
    4. If the article is accepted after the adjustments, the author or authors sign a letter of assignment of rights to the journal to allow its publication, where also, That the article is an original work in the sense in which it is derived from work investigative or of an own intellectual activity; that the bibliographic sources have been contrasted so as not to fall into false information that usually circulates in social networks and internet pages, among others.
    5. Whatever the decision, the final results of the evaluation process will be unappealable.
    6. Between the presentation of the article, evaluation, corrections and publication, the journal has at least 16 weeks.
Make a Submission

Information

Perfil de Google Scholar

Keywords

ISSN

ISSN impreso: 1657-4672

ISSN electrónico: 2619-1733

QR code

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |