CAPACIDADES DINÁMICAS E INNOVACIÓN: ANALISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO Y PERSPECTIVAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN CON BASE EN EL ÁRBOL DE LA CIENCIA

DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION: INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURE AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA

Publicado 2025-06-11


https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v26.n1.5401.2025
Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP
Número
Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2025): Lúmina 26(1)
Sección
Artículo de investigación científica
Cómo citar
Vieira Salazar, J. A., Salazar Cardona, J., Galvis Nieto, T., & Carvajal Marín, J. A. (2025). CAPACIDADES DINÁMICAS E INNOVACIÓN: ANALISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO Y PERSPECTIVAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN CON BASE EN EL ÁRBOL DE LA CIENCIA. Lúmina, 26(1), E0072. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v26.n1.5401.2025
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v26.n1.5401.2025
Dimensions
PlumX

Cómo citar

Vieira Salazar, J. A., Salazar Cardona, J., Galvis Nieto, T., & Carvajal Marín, J. A. (2025). CAPACIDADES DINÁMICAS E INNOVACIÓN: ANALISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO Y PERSPECTIVAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN CON BASE EN EL ÁRBOL DE LA CIENCIA. Lúmina, 26(1), E0072. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v26.n1.5401.2025

Descargar cita

Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Jaime Andres Vieira Salazar
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Perfil Google Scholar
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-4440 ORCID
Jacobo Salazar Cardona
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3857-5093 ORCID
Tatiana Galvis Nieto
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3599-3266 ORCID
Jenny Alejandra Carvajal Marín
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9966-1357 ORCID
Mostrar biografía de los autores

Jaime Andres Vieira Salazar,

Profesor titular de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia de dedicación exclusiva. Grupo de Investigación: Gestión Responsable para la Sostenibilidad Territorial -GREST-. Docente investigador con 23 años de experiencia en el área, así como en diferentes cargos académico administrativos en la Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Jefe Oficina de Planeación y Estadística; representante profesoral ante varios Consejos y Comités; coordinador de Maestría en Administración; Decano de la Facultad de Administración y director y gestor del Doctorado en Administración.
Estudios:
PhD en Gestión, Université de Rouen (Francia). MSc en Development Administration, University of Birmingham (Inglaterra). MSc en Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (sede Bogotá). Ingeniero industrial, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (sede Manizales)

Este artículo examina la relación entre las capacidades dinámicas (CD) y la innovación, temática que, aunque ha generado un creciente interés en el ámbito empresarial y en la literatura científica, se evidencia una brecha sobre el análisis de la estructura intelectual del conocimiento en dicha relación. El objetivo de este documento consistió en mapear dicha estructura e identificar las tendencias de investigación en torno al tema mediante un análisis bibliométrico. Utilizando la metodología del Árbol de la Ciencia, se realizó un análisis de la literatura disponible en Scopus y Web of Science. Los hallazgos revelan una clara relación entre el uso y fomento de las CD para un mayor rendimiento innovador corporativo, lo que, en la práctica, conlleva priorizar el desarrollo de CD en la estrategia empresarial, facilitando su alineación con los objetivos globales de sostenibilidad y así, mejorar su ventaja competitiva en un mercado volátil.

Visitas del artículo 153 | Visitas PDF 86

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Aftab, J., Abid, N., Sarwar, H., Amin, A., Abedini, M., & Veneziani, M. (2024). Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 1634–1653. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2654
  2. Agarwal, R., & Selen, W. (2013). The incremental and cumulative effects of dynamic capability building on service innovation in collaborative service organizations. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(5), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.5
  3. Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912–4917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052
  4. Alves, A. C., Barbieux, D., Reichert, F. M., Tello-Gamarra, J., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Innovation and dynamic capabilities of the firm: Defining an assessment model. RAE, 57(3), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020170304
  5. Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
  6. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  7. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
  8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  10. Bitencourt, C. C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Santos, A. C., & Teixeira, E. K. (2020). The extended dynamic capabilities model: A meta-analysis. European Management Journal, 38(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.007
  11. Chen, Y.-S. (2007). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1
  12. Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5
  13. Chen, Y.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Lin, C.-Y., & Chang, C.-W. (2015). Enhancing green absorptive capacity, green dynamic capacities and green service innovation to improve firm performance: An analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM). Sustainability, 7(11), 15674–15692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115674
  14. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
  15. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  16. Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932
  17. Echeverri-Rubio, A., Florez-Yepes, G. Y. F., & Vargas-Marín, L. A. V. (2022). Gobernanza para el desarrollo y la sostenibilidad de los destinos turísticos: una revisión de la literatura con ToS. Revista de Ingenierias Interfaces, 5(1), 1-22. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8661443
  18. Edward Freeman, R., & McVea, J. (2017). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. En The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (pp. 183–201). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00007.x
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  20. Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  21. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329
  22. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation. Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927
  23. Franco, M., Minatogawa, V., Duran, O., Batocchio, A., & Quadros, R. (2021). Opening the dynamic capability black box: An approach to business model innovation management in the digital era. IEEE access: practical innovations, open solutions, 9, 69189–69209. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3077849
  24. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  25. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  26. Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655
  27. Hermawati, A. (2020). The implementation of dynamic capabilities for SMEs in creating innovation. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-06-2019-0077
  28. Huanca-Arohuanca, J. W. (2022). Combate cuerpo a cuerpo para entrar a la Liga de los Dioses: Scopus y Web of Science como fin supremo. Revista venezolana de gerencia, 27(Edición Especial 7), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.7.43
  29. Huang, J.-W., & Li, Y.-H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
  30. Inigo, E. A., Albareda, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: exploring evolutionary and radical approaches through dynamic capabilities. Industry and innovation, 24(5), 515–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1310034
  31. Juntarukka, S., & Ueasangkomsate, P. (2022, septiembre 19). The research trends and directions on innovation and dynamic capability in SMEs. 2022 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference - Asia Pacific (TEMSCON-ASPAC). 2022 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference - Asia Pacific (TEMSCON-ASPAC), Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/temscon-aspac52831.2022.9916549
  32. Juntunen, M., & Lehenkari, M. (2021). A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1630813
  33. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  34. Köseoglu, M. A. (2020). Identifying the intellectual structure of fields: introduction of the MAK approach. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2169–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03719-8
  35. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
  36. Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-S. (2017). Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity, 51(4), 1663–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0358-6
  37. López, J. C. M., Robledo, S., & Duque-Méndez, N. D. (2017). Marketing Emprendedor: Una perspectiva cronológica utilizando Tree of Science. Revista Civilizar de Empresa y Economía, 7(13), 113–123. https://revistas.usergioarboleda.edu.co/index.php/ceye/article/view/923
  38. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  39. Martins de Paiva, E., Rezende da Costa, P., Alves de Paiva, J., & Mira da Silva, M. (2024). Detecting Communities in Digital Disruptive Innovation and Dynamic Capabilities Using Social Network Analysis. Journal of Management & Technology, 24(3), 7–35. https://revistagt.fpl.emnuvens.com.br/get/article/view/2586/1657
  40. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2014). Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA. Revista española de nutrición humana y dietética, 18(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.18.3.114
  41. Munim, Z. H. (2019). Autonomous ships: a review, innovative applications and future maritime business models. Supply Chain Forum an International Journal, 20(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2019.1631714
  42. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01601
  43. Pedraza-Navarro, I., & Sánchez-Serrano, S. (2022). Análisis de las publicaciones presentes en WoS y Scopus. Posibilidades de búsqueda para evitar literatura fugitiva en las revisiones sistemáticas. Revista interuniversitaria de investigación en tecnología educativa, 41–61. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.548361
  44. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  45. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
  46. Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780
  47. Ramos-Enríquez, V., Duque, P., & Salazar, J. A. V. (2021). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Emprendimiento: evolución y tendencias de investigación. Desarrollo Gerencial, 13(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.13.1.4210
  48. Robledo, S., Osorio Zuluaga, G., & López-Espinosa, C. (2014). Networking en pequeña empresa: una revisión bibliográfica utilizando la teoría de grafos. Revista Vínculos, 11(2), 6–16.
  49. Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Javed, S. A., Zafar, A. U., & Rehman, S. U. (2020). Relation of environment sustainability to CSR and green innovation: A case of Pakistani manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253(119938), 119938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119938
  50. Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2906
  51. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  52. Teece, D. J. (2015). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. En The Eclectic Paradigm (pp. 224–273). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-54471-1_9
  53. Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
  54. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journa, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  55. Valencia-Hernandez, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque-Méndez, N. D., & Olivar-Tost, G. (2020). SAP algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to tree of Science. Ingeniería e Investigación, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
  56. Vieira, J. A., & Echeverri, A. (2024). Estructura intelectual de la investigación sobre greenwashing: análisis bibliométrico y narrativo. Revista Universidad y Empresa, 26(46), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.13615
  57. Vieira Salazar, J. A., Echeverri Rubio, A., & Mejía-Franco, N. (2021). Efectos socio-espaciales del turismo en procesos de gentrificación: análisis bibliométrico y de literatura. Revista venezolana de gerencia, 26(5 Edición Especial), 540–562. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.26.e5.35
  58. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  59. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  60. Wilches-Visbal, J. H., Castillo-Pedraza, M. C., & Obispo-Salazar, K. J. (2023). Clasificación de revistas científicas Publindex 2022: ¿Scopus/Web of Science o perecer? Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander Salud, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.18273/saluduis.55.e:23028
  61. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
  62. Yousaf, Z. (2021). Go for green: green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(39), 54863–54875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14343-1
  63. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Information Systems Research : ISR, 13(2), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.147.90
  64. Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229
  65. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
  66. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
  67. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
  68. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2010). The Business Model: Theoretical Roots, Recent Developments, and Future Research. Business School. University of Navarra. https://www.iese.edu/media/research/pdfs/DI-0862-E.pdf
  69. Zuluaga, M., Robledo, G., Osorio-Zuluaga, G. A., Yathe, L., Gonzalez, D., & Taborda, G. (2016). Metabolomics and pesticides: systematic literature review using graph theory for analysis of references. Nova, 14(25), 121–138.

Información

Perfil de Google Scholar

Indexación
DIRECTORIOS

PKP INDEX

LATIN REV

CAPES

BASE

OAJI

ECONBIZ

MIAR

BASE

SCILIT         

WORLDCAT

CROSSREF 

CIRC

EZB LIBRARY

 

Palabras clave

Código QR

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |