EL Impacto de la neurociencia en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Evidencia de una revisión sistemática.

Applications of neuroscience in physics education. A systematic review.

Publicado 2025-06-05


https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.2.5150.2025
Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP EPUB HTML XML
Número
Vol. 34 Núm. 2 (2025)
Sección
Artículos
Cómo citar
Tinjaca Muñoz, M. A. (2025). EL Impacto de la neurociencia en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Evidencia de una revisión sistemática. Plumilla Educativa, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.2.5150.2025
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.2.5150.2025
Dimensions
PlumX

Cómo citar

Tinjaca Muñoz, M. A. (2025). EL Impacto de la neurociencia en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Evidencia de una revisión sistemática. Plumilla Educativa, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.2.5150.2025

Descargar cita

Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Manuel Antonio Tinjaca Muñoz
Secretaria de Educación de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8310-5332 ORCID
Mostrar biografía de los autores

Manuel Antonio Tinjaca Muñoz,

Licenciado en Física Universidad Francisco José de Caldas

Especialista en Multimedia para la Docencia Universidad cooperativa de Colombia

Master en Tecnología Educativa y Competencia Digitales Universidad de la Rioja España

 

Este artículo, basado en una revisión sistemática de la literatura es un artículo de reflexión que aborda la aplicación de la neurociencia en la educación. La revisión se realizó entre fuentes académicas publicadas en diferentes países, durante el año 2024. En las últimas décadas, la neuroeducación ha emergido como una disciplina clave para mejorar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje mediante una comprensión profunda del cerebro humano. Uno de los conceptos fundamentales es la plasticidad cerebral, que refleja la capacidad del cerebro para reorganizarse en respuesta a nuevas experiencias, lo que subraya la importancia de proporcionar entornos de aprendi- zaje ricos y variados que fortalezcan las conexiones neuronales y mejoren las capacidades cognitivas de los estudiantes. Se destacan varias técnicas pedagógicas basadas en la neurociencia educativa, como el aprendizaje basado en proyectos y el aprendizaje activo, que han demostrado ser eficaces para mejorar la retención de información y la motivación intrínseca. Además, se discute la ne- cesidad de corregir los neuromitos comunes en el ámbito educativo y la relevancia de la educación emocional para crear ambientes de aprendizaje más efectivos. El estudio enfatiza la necesidad de formación continua para los docentes en neurociencia educativa y la adopción de tecnologías educativas, como neurorobots y EEG, para apoyar el desarrollo de métodos de enseñanza personalizados y adaptativos que mejoren el rendimiento académico y el bienestar

Visitas del artículo 990 | Visitas PDF 689

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Aldemir, T., Davidesco, I., Kelly, S. M., Glaser, N., Kyle, A. M., Montrosse-Moorhead, B., & Lane,
  2. K. (2022). Investigating Students’ Learning Experiences in a Neural Engineering Integrated STEM High School Curriculum. Education Sciences, 12(10), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100705
  3. Amjad, A. I., Habib, M., Tabassum, U., Alvi, G. F., & Taseer, N. A. (2023). The Impact of Brain-Based Learning on Students Intrinsic Motivation to Learn and Perform in Mathematics: A Neuroscien- tific Study in School Psychology. Lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2023.318
  4. Blondel, D. V., Sansone, A., Rosenberg, J. M., Godin, E. A., Yang, B. W., Jaglom-Kurtz, L. T., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Schwartz-Bloom, R. D. (2019). Development of an Online Experiment Platform for High School Biology. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 3(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-019-00030-5
  5. Bransford, John., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Developments in the Scien- ce of Learning., & National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (p. 374). National Academy Press.
  6. Brick, K., Cooper, J. L., Mason, L., Faeflen, S., Monmia, J., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2021a). Tiered Neuroscience and Mental Health Professional Development in Liberia Improves Teacher Self- Efficacy, Self-Responsibility, and Motivation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 664730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.664730
  7. Brick, K., Cooper, J. L., Mason, L., Faeflen, S., Monmia, J., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2021b). Training-of- Trainers Neuroscience and Mental Health Teacher Education in Liberia Improves Self-Reported Support for Students. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 653069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.653069
  8. Buckley, E., Monaco, J. D., Schultz, K. M., Chalmers, R. W., Hadzic, A., Zhang, K., Hwang, G. M., & Carr, M. D. (2022). An interdisciplinary approach to high school curriculum development: Swarming Powered by Neuroscience. 2022 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC54952.2022.10025252
  9. Caballe, S. (2015). Towards a Multi-modal Emotion-Awareness e-Learning System. 2015 Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2015.88
  10. Cherrier, S., Le Roux, P.-Y., Gerard, F.-M., Wattelez, G., & Galy, O. (2020). Impact of a neuros- cience intervention (NeuroStratE) on the school performance of high school students: Acade- mic achievement, self-knowledge and autonomy through a metacognitive approach. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 18, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100125
  11. Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012a). Neuromyths in Education: Preva- lence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
  12. Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012b). Neuromyths in education: Preva- lence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429
  13. Dikker, S., Haegens, S., Bevilacqua, D., Davidesco, I., Wan, L., Kaggen, L., McClintock, J., Cha- loner, K., Ding, M., West, T., & Poeppel, D. (2020). Morning brain: Real-world neural evidence that high school class times matter. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(11), 1193- 1202. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa142
  14. Doukakis, S., & Alexopoulos, E. C. (2020). Knowledge Transformation and Distance Learning for Secondary Education Students—The Role of Educational Neuroscience. 2020 5th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM), 1-5.https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM49515.2020.9221821
  15. Doukakis, S., Niari, M., Malliou, E., Vlachou, S., & Filippakopoulou, E. (2022). Teaching Informatics to Adults of Vocational Schools during the Pandemic: Students’ Views and the Role of Neu- roeducation. Information, 13(6), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13060274
  16. Doukakis, S., Sfyris, P., Niari, M., & Alexopoulos, E. (2021). Exploring Educational Practices in Emergency Remote Teaching. The Role of Educational Neuroscience. 2021 IEEE Global En- gineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1026-1034. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454143
  17. Draganski, B., Busch, V., & Bogdahn, U. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. www.nature.com/nature
  18. Espino-Díaz, L., Fernández-Caminero, G., Hernández-Lloret, C.-M., González-González, H., & Álvarez-Castillo, J.-L. (2021). Emotional Intelligence and Executive Functions in the Prediction of Prosocial Behavior in High School Students. An InterDisciplinary Approach between Neuros- cience and Education. Children, 8(9), 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8090759
  19. Frey, J., Vo, Q., Kramer, J., Melnic, V., & Adcock, A. (2021). Impact of Early Introduction to the Neurosciences on West Virginia High School Students via the Brain Bee. Medical Science Educator, 31(5), 1601-1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01347-2
  20. Ghani, N., Baker, H., Huntsinger, A., Chen, T., Familara, T. D., Itorralba, J. Y., Vanderford, F., Zhuang, X., Chang, C.-L., Vo, V., & Oh, E. C. (2024). Science Education for the Youth (SEFTY): A Neuroscience Outreach Program for High School Students in Southern Nevada during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eneuro, 11(4), ENEURO.0039-24.2024.https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0039-24.2024
  21. Hachem, M., Daignault, K., & Wilcox, G. (2022). Impact of Educational Neuroscience Teacher Professional Development: Perceptions of School Personnel. Frontiers in Education, 7, 912827. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.912827
  22. Harris, C. A., Guerri, L., Mircic, S., Reining, Z., Amorim, M., Jović, Ð., Wallace, W., DeBoer, J., & Gage, G. J. (2020). Neurorobotics Workshop for High School Students Promotes Competence and Confidence in Computational Neuroscience. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.00006
  23. Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Soni García, A., & Lipina, S. J. (2016a). Conceptions and mis- conceptions about neuroscience in preschool teachers: A study from Argentina. Educational Research, 58(4), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1238585
  24. Hermida, M. J., Segretin, M. S., Soni García, A., & Lipina, S. J. (2016b). Conceptions and mis- conceptions about neuroscience in preschool teachers: A study from Argentina. Educational Research, 58(4), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1238585
  25. Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Jour- nal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02068.x
  26. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2007.00004.x
  27. Jeyavel, S., Pandey, V., Rajkumar, E., & Lakshmana, G. (2022). Neuromyths in Education: Preva- lence Among South Indian School Teachers. Frontiers in Education, 7, 781735. https:// doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.781735
  28. Kamenická, J. (2021). Apple Tree Model of Emotion-Involved Processing: Videos for Emotions and Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.103.116
  29. Tinjaca M, M.A. (2025). El impacto de la neurociencia en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje: evidencia de una revisión sistemática. Plumilla Educativa, 34 (2) 1-23 p.DOI: https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.34.2.5150.2025
  30. Kazanjian, C. J., & Rossatto, C. A. (2020). Critical Culturally Relevant Synergism in Higher Edu- cation: Equitable Educational Experiences Through Neuroscientific Curricula. En L. Parson &
  31. C. C. Ozaki (Eds.), Teaching and Learning for Social Justice and Equity in Higher Education (pp. 199-218). Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1_11
  32. Lagoudakis, N., Vlachos, F., Christidou, V., & Vavougios, D. (2022). The effectiveness of a teaching approach using brain-based learning elements on students’ performance in a Biology course. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2158672. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2158672
  33. Lichtenberg, N. T., Thompson, A. B., Iguchi, M. Y., Evans, C. J., & Romero-Calderón, R. (2020). An Undergraduate Student-Led Neuroscience Outreach Program Shows Promise in Shifting Teen Attitudes About Drugs. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(4), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12261
  34. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
  35. Miranda Feitosa, L., Ferreira Alves, C., Ramalho Figueiredo, N., Leite Nascimento, W., Beatriz Adriano Da Silva, A., Rivera Ikeda, S., Shigaeff, N., Maximino, C., & Lima-Maximino, M. (2021). Open Practical Laboratories in the Neurosciences: An outreach program for neuroscience communication in middle schools. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(6), 1504-1514. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24800
  36. Rakhmetova, A., Meiirova, G., Balpanova, D., Baidullayeva, A., & Nurmakhanova, D. (2024). The use of elements of neuropedagogy in the creation of virtual simulators for in-depth study of chemistry in higher education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 473. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2532
  37. Yermakova, S., Ivanova, O., Horytska, O., Polishchuk, V., Polukhtovych, T., & Vivcharenko, T. (2023). Influence of the Neuro-Educational Environment on One’s Socialization under Total Digitalization. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 14(4), 593- 611. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.4/522

Información

Perfil de Google Scholar

Palabras clave

ISSN

ISSN impreso: 1657-4672

ISSN electrónico: 2619-1733

Código QR

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |