Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Connecting Minds and Machines: Neuroeducation and AI in the Age of Computational Thinking

Conectando mentes y máquinas: neuroeducación e IA en la era del pensamiento computacional




Section
Articles

How to Cite
Restrepo Pineda, A. F. (2024). Connecting Minds and Machines: Neuroeducation and AI in the Age of Computational Thinking. Plumilla Educativa, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.1.5090.2024
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Restrepo Pineda, A. F. (2024). Connecting Minds and Machines: Neuroeducation and AI in the Age of Computational Thinking. Plumilla Educativa, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30554/p.e.1.5090.2024

Download Citation

Andres Felipe Restrepo Pineda

The article is based on ongoing research: Cyberdiverse-cyber- being, Educational Cybernetics, and Training of Children in Diversity. It is important to understand the convergence of neuroeducation and AI (Artificial Intelligence is the digital mind that will shape tomorrow, forging a world where machines transcend the limits of human ima- gination) through the revolutionary implications for neuroscience. Neuroeducation, an interdisciplinary field that combines neuroscience and education, is undergoing a high-impact transformation, thanks to the integration of concepts of computational thinking, artificial inte- lligence, programming, and robotics. This thought-provoking article explores how these emerging areas are converging and making a significant impact on neuroscience. Computational thinking has be- come a fundamental tool for the analysis of neuro-educational data. Machine learning algorithms can process large brain data sets and provide valuable insights into how students learn and retain informa- tion. This allows educators to adapt their pedagogical approaches to optimize individual learning. AI systems can create adaptive learning environments that automatically adjust to the needs of each student, thereby improving the effectiveness of the educational process and activating brain areas related to problem-solving and creativity.


Article visits 790 | PDF visits 439


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Ardila, A. & Rosselli, M. (1992). Neuropsicología Clínica. Medellín: Prensa Creativa.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2004). Modernidad líquida. México D.F.: Editorial Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  3. Bra P. & Calvi L.: AHA! An open Adaptative HipermediaArchitecture. The New Review of Hypermedia
  4. and Multimedia, Vol. 4, Taylor Graham Publishers, 1998, pp. 115139.
  5. Chakraborti, T., Kulkarni, A., Sreedharan, S., Smith, D. E., & Kambhampati, S. (2019). Explicability?
  6. Legibility? Predictability? Transparency? Privacy? Security? The Emerging Landscape of
  7. Interpretable Agent Behavior. In J. Benton (Ed) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International
  8. Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (Vol. 29) (ICAPS 2019) (pp. 86-96). Association
  9. for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  10. Coglianese, C. y Lehr, D. (2017). Regulating by Robot: Administrative Decision Making in the
  11. Machine Learning Era. Georgetown Law Journal, Forthcoming, University of Penn, Institute for
  12. Law & Econ Research Paper, (17-8).
  13. Cotino H, L. (2019), Riesgos e impactos del Big Data, la inteligencia artificial y la robótica. Enfoques,
  14. modelos y principios de la respuesta del derecho. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo,
  15. (50).
  16. Duque M, N. D. Duque M, (20006).Modelo Adaptativo Multi agente Para La Planificación Y Ejecución
  17. De Cursos Virtuales Personalizados. Universidad Nacional.
  18. González G., H. M., Duque M., N. D., & Ovalle C., D. A. (2008). Modelo del Estudiante para Sistemas
  19. Adaptativos de Educación Virtual. Revista Avances en Sistemas e Informática, 5(1), 199-206.
  20. Molina V, J., Torres P, C., & Restrepo P, C. (2008). Técnicas de Inteligencia Artificial para la Solución
  21. de Laberintos de Estructura Desconocida. Scientia Et Technica, XIV (39), 135-140.
  22. Monasterio, A. (2017). Ética algorítmica: Implicaciones éticas de una sociedad cada vez más
  23. gobernada por algoritmos. Dilemata, Ética de datos, sociedad y ciudadanía, (24), pp. 185-217.
  24. Navas T, O., (2021). En el umbral de una nueva era: El derecho privado ante la robótica y la
  25. inteligencia artificial. Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia, (9), 178-219.
  26. https://doi.org/10.26807/rfj.vi9.309
  27. Petersen, S. E., & Sporns, O. (2015). Brain Networks and Cognitive Architectures. Neuron Perspective,
  28. (1), 207-219. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.027
  29. Ríos, J. B., & Parra, J. E. D. (2017). Las células pensantes (1st ed.). Sello Editorial Universidad
  30. de Caldas. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv92vphn
  31. Rosselli, M., (2003). Maduración cerebral y desarrollo cognoscitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de
  32. Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 1(1).
  33. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (1996). Inteligencia artificial: un enfoque moderno. México: Prentice
  34. Hall Hispanoamericana, S.A.
  35. Santos G, M. (2017). Regulación legal de la robótica y la IA: retos de futuro. Revista Jurídica de
  36. la Universidad de León, (4), pp. 25-50.
  37. Tovar, B; L. Muñoz G, L.; Murrieta C, M.; Alencastre M, Monroy R & Set H. (2006). Planning
  38. exploration strategies for simultaneous localization and mapping, Robotics and Autonomous
  39. Systems, Elsevier, Vol 54, 2006, pp. 314–331.
  40. Vélez B, J. I., Castillo Ossa, L. F., & González B, M. (2021). Aproximación desde la Inteligencia
  41. Artificial a los comportamientos poco predictivos derivados de modelos cognitivos artificiales.
  42. Tesis Psicológica, 16(2), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.37511/tesis.v16n2a1
  43. Villada O, D., Grisales G, M. C., Prada Espitia, D. A., Ocampo H, J. E., García N, M. L., Villada Y,
  44. M. (2016) Autorregulación e investigación: habilidades en trayecto. Fondo Editorial, Universidad
  45. de Manizales.
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |