Literary work and ordinary language, two faces of the same currency
Obra literaria y lenguaje ordinario, dos caras de una misma moneda
How to Cite
Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Show authors biography
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Luis Armando Buitrago Osorio, Libia Salgado Acosta, Dostoevsky's White Nights in Light of Mary Louise Pratt's Proposal , Escribanía: Vol. 18 No. 2 (23)
- Luis Armando Buitrago Osorio, Brian Gallego Londoño, El terror filosófico, perspectivas de la literatura del siglo XXI , Escribanía: Vol. 19 No. 2 (24)
- Luis Armando Buitrago Osorio, Natalia Arango Hernández , Valentina Marín Arias , Japanese horror: Literary perspectives of the 21st century , Escribanía: Vol. 21 No. 1 (26)
- Libia Salgado Acosta, Luis Armando Buitrago Osorio, Aproximación a La peste de Camus desde la propuesta semiótica de Joseph Courtés , Escribanía: Vol. 19 No. 2 (24)
This article pretends to make a quick review through the principal theories of pragmatics, also to show some of the most relevant points of view in terms of literary criticisim and literary theory; this with the purpose of having tools to show that it is possible to make a pragmatic analysis on the field of literature, so concepts that were already taken as correct on the differences between or- dinary language and literary language are only apparent differences, based on the usage that language receives during specific situations. In this way, various authors will be cited from both fields, pragmatics and literature, to make possi- ble the construction of a way that can help as an illustrative form to show a new perspective that seems now forgotten, pragma literature, it’s relevance and it ́s development will be vital to look for a way of approaching literary analysis from a more communicative point of view.
Article visits 349 | PDF visits 427
