Self-efficacy and academic achievement in virtual learning environments

Autoeficacia y logro académico en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje

Published 2023-01-13


https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.1.4792.2023
Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP EPUB (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)
Issue
Vol. 31 Num. 1 (2023)
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Triana Vera, S. ., & López Vargas, O. . (2023). Self-efficacy and academic achievement in virtual learning environments. Plumilla Educativa, 31(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.1.4792.2023
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.1.4792.2023
Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Triana Vera, S. ., & López Vargas, O. . (2023). Self-efficacy and academic achievement in virtual learning environments. Plumilla Educativa, 31(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.30554/pe.1.4792.2023

Download Citation

license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sonia Triana Vera
Docente Secretaría de Educación y Cultura de Soacha
Perfil Google Scholar
Omar López Vargas
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
Perfil Google Scholar
Show authors biography

This study explores possible relationships between academic achievement, academic self-efficacy and self-efficacy for learning in online environments in students with different cognitive styles in the FDI dimension (1977). The study involved 178 tenth graders from an official education institution in the municipality of Soacha, department of Cundinamarca, Colombia. This research uses a quantitative approach with a multivariate statistical analysis, tests were conducted to identify cognitive style, independent variable, learning achievement, academic self-efficacy and self-efficacy for learning in online environments, dependent variable. A Manova analysis showed a significant difference in relation to academic self-efficacy and learning achievement in favor of field independent students, and no statistically significant differences were observed in self-efficacy for learning in online environments in students with different cognitive styles.

Article visits 1112 | PDF visits 864

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aldhahi, M., Baattaiah, B., Alqahtani, A. (2021). Predictors of Electronic Learning Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabian Universities. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.614333
  2. Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual Differences: Implications for Web-based Learning Design. International Education Journal, 4(4), 188–196. http://iej.cjb.net
  3. Alomyan, H. (2017). A conceptual framework for web-based learning design. International Conference E-Learning, 191–195.
  4. Artino, A., McCoach, B. (2008). Development and initial validation of the online learning value and self-efficacy scale. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.c
  5. Bandura, A. (1994a). Encyclopedia of mental health (Vol. 4). Academic Press.
  6. Bandura, A. (1994b). Self-Efficacy. En Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). V. S. Ramachaudran. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control (Primera). Stanford University.
  8. Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory : An agentic Albert Bandura. Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024
  9. Beserra, V., Nussbaum, M., Oteo, M., Martin, R. (2014). Measuring cognitive load in practicing arithmetic using educational video games on a shared display. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.016
  10. Bradley, R., Browne, B., & Kelley, H. (2017). Examining the Influence of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation in Online Learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518–531. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325743793
  11. Calderín, M., & Csoban, E. (2010). Elementos para un programa de alfabetización informacional: la autoeficacia hacia el uso de las computadoras. Biblios: Revista Electrónica de Bibliotecología, Archivología y Museología, 37.
  12. Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934
  13. Castellanos P, V., Latorre V, D. C., Mateus G, S. M., & Navarro R, C. P. (2017). Modelo Explicativo del Desempeño Académico desde la Autoeficacia y los Problemas de Conducta. En Revista Colombiana de Psicologia (Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 149–161). Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.56221
  14. Chen, L. Y., Hsiao, B., Chern, C. C., & Chen, H. G. (2014). Affective mechanisms linking Internet use to learning performance in high school students: A moderated mediation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.025
  15. Colvin, R., & Mayer, R. (2011). E-Learnisn and the science of instruction (Vol. 91).
  16. De la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Garzón U, A., Vera-Martínez, M. M., Fadda, S., Gaeta G, M. L. (2021). Self-Regulation and Regulatory Teaching as Determinants of Academic Behavioral Confidence and Procrastination in Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602904
  17. Dixon, H., Hawe, E., Hamilton, R. (2020). The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1666084
  18. Garrison, D., Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (RoutledgeFalmer, Ed.; 1a ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library.
  19. Guzman M, A. (2021). Pedagogías emergentes para garantizar una educación inclusiva en tiempos de confinamiento. Revista Varela, 21(60), 180–186. http://revistavarela.uclv.edu.cu
  20. Hederich M, C. (2004). Estilos cognitivos en la dimensión Independencia Dependencia de Campo -Influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educación-. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
  21. Hederich M, C. (2015). Las expectativas frustradas de la educación virtual: ¿Cuestión de estilo cognitivo? En Educación y Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (pp. 17–48).
  22. Hederich M, C., López V, O., Camargo U, A. (2016). Effects of the use of a flexible metacognitive scaffolding on self-regulated learning during virtual education. Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3), 199–216.
  23. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. Educase Quartely, 4, 51–55.
  24. Ithriah, S. A., Ridwandono, D., & Suryanto, T. L. M. (2020). Online Learning Self-Efficacy: The Role in E-Learning Success. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1569(2), 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1569/2/022053
  25. López V, O., Bermúdez M, M., & Sanabria R, L. (2022). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un videojuego. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 1(85).
  26. López V, O., & Hederich M, C. C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. 58.
  27. López V, O., Hederich M, C., & Camargo U, Á. (2011). Estilo cognitivo y logro académico. Educación y .Educadores. Universidad de La Sabana , 14(1), 67–82.
  28. López V, O., Hederich M, C., & Camargo U, Á. (2012). Logro en matemáticas, autorregulación del aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo. Suma Psicologica, 19(2), 39–50.
  29. López V, O., Ibáñez I, J., & Racines P, O. (2017). Students’ Metacognition and Cognitive Style and Their Effect on Cognitive Load and Learning Achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  30. López V, O., Ortiz V, J., Ibáñez I, J. (2020). Autoeficacia y logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes con diferente estilo cognitivo en un ambiente m-learning. Pensamiento Psicológico, 18(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI18-1.alae
  31. López V, O., Triana V, S. (2013). Efecto de un activador computacional de autoeficacia sobre el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de diferente estilo cognitivo. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh145
  32. López V, O., & Valencia V, N. (2012). Individual Differences in the Development of Self-Efficacy and. Acta Colombiana de Psicologia, 15(11), 29–41.
  33. Mui, C. (2016). The trend and delivery architecture of e-learning system. En E-Systems for the 21st Century: Concept, Developments, and Applications (pp. 84–104).
  34. Nozari, A., Siamian, H. (2015). The Relationship between Field Dependent-Independent Cognitive Style and Understanding of English Text Reading and Academic Success. Materia Socio Medica, 27(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.27.39-41
  35. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings Author. American Educational Research Association, 66(4), 543–578.
  36. Peechapol, C., Na-Songkhla, J., Sujiva, S., Luangsodsai, A. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing self-efficacy in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8351
  37. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor. Michigan, 48109(August 2016), 1259. https://doi.org/ED338122
  38. Prineas, M., Foreword, M. C., Ewell, P., & Cini, M. (2011). National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment | 1 Assessing Learning in Online Education: The Role of Technology in Improving Student Outcomes National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment About the Authors.
  39. Ratsameemonthon, L., Ho, R., Tuicomepee, A., Blauw, J. (2018). Influence of achievement goals and academic self-efficacy on academic achievement of Thai undergraduate students: Across non procrastinators and procrastinators. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 16(45), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v16i45.2093
  40. Rodríguez G, M. del S., & Gaeta G, M. L. (2020). Perfiles motivacionales, estrategias volitivas y rendimiento académico en ciencias exactas y experimentales de bachillerato. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 18(51), 207–224.
  41. Saenz, J. M., Domínguez, C., & Mendoza, V. (2014). Valoración de los obstáculos, ventajas y prácticas del e-learning : un estudio de caso en Universidades Iberoamericanas. Educación Siglo XXI, 32, 195–220.
  42. Sawa, H. (1966). Analytic thinking and synthetic thinking.Bulletin of Faculty ofEducation,13, 1–16.
  43. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Teorías del aprendizaje : una perspectiva educativa (Sexta). Pearson Educación.
  44. Stephen, J. S., & Rockinson S, A. J. (2021). A high-impact practice for online students: the use of a first-semester seminar course to promote self-regulation, self-direction, online learning self-efficacy. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00151-0
  45. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1994). Using Multivariate Statistics (Vol. 1).
  46. Talsma, K., Robertson, K., Thomas, C., & Norris, K. (2021). COVID-19 Beliefs, Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in First-year University Students: Cohort Comparison and Mediation Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643408
  47. Tempelaar, D., Kuperus, B. T. A., Cuypers, H., Van der Kooij, H., Van de Vrie, E., Heck, A. (2012). The Role of Digital, Formative Testing in e-Learning for Mathematics: A Case Study in the Netherlands. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 9(1), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i1.1272
  48. Tinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., Páramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence Adaptive Teaching and Field Dependence-Independence: Instructional Implications Enseñanza adaptativa y dependencia-independencia de campo: implicaciones instruccionales. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43(3), 497–510.
  49. Ulfatun, T., Septiyanti, F., & Lesmana, A. G. (2021). University students’ online learning self-efficacy and self-regulated learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(12), 597–602. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJIET.2021.11.12.1570
  50. Valencia V, N. (2017). Autoeficacia académica, capacidad metacognitiva, logro de aprendizaje y estilo cognitivo en ambientes e-learning. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
  51. Valencia V, N., López V O., Sanabria R, L. (2016). Self-Efficacy in Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Bibliometric Analysis. Psychology, 07(14), 1839–1857. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.714170
  52. Valencia V, N., López V, O., & Sanabria R, L. (2018). Effect of motivational scaffolding on e-learning environments: Self-efficacy, learning achievement, cognitive style. Journal of Educators Online, 51(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1168944
  53. Valencia V, N., López V, O., Sanabria R, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL) Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(1), 1–19.
  54. Velandia, M. R., Torres, A. L., & Núñez, M. (2012). Using Web-Based Activities to Promote Reading: An Exploratory Study with Teenagers. Profile, 14(2), 11–27.
  55. Witkin, H., Asch, S. (1948). Studies in space orientation. IV. further experiments on perception of the up-right with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 38(6), 762–782.
  56. Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64.
  57. Yavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan, E. (2020). The online learning self-efficacy scale: Its adaptation into turkish and interpretation according to various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE , 21(1), 31–44.
  58. Yokoyama, S. (2019). Academic self-efficacy and academic performance in Online Learning: A mini review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JAN), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02794
  59. You, J. W. (2018). Testing the three-way interaction effect of academic stress, academic self-efficacy, and task value on persistence in learning among Korean college students. Higher Education, 76(5), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0255-0
  60. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. En A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (Tercera). Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247480203
  61. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attening self-regulation A social cognitive perspective. En Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39).
  62. Zimmerman, W. (2017). Predicting Success in an Online Course using Expectancies, Values, and Typical Mode of Instruction. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Edication, 32(1), 2–20.
  63. Zimmerman, W., & Kulikowich, J. (2016). Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801

Information

Perfil de Google Scholar

Keywords

ISSN

ISSN impreso: 1657-4672

ISSN electrónico: 2619-1733

QR code

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |