Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The stifling embrace of the colonial power: Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversion of life in the film Embrace of the Serpent

El abrazo asfixiante del poder colonial: Otredad,tercer espacio y conversión de la vida en lapelícula El Abrazo de la Serpiente





Section
Forgers: Research Articles

How to Cite
López-Londoño, L. M. (2025). The stifling embrace of the colonial power: Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversion of life in the film Embrace of the Serpent. Escribanía, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/escribania.v23i1.5378
Download Citation

Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

López-Londoño, L. M. (2025). The stifling embrace of the colonial power: Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversion of life in the film Embrace of the Serpent. Escribanía, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/escribania.v23i1.5378

Download Citation

Luis Miguel López-Londoño

Luis Miguel López-Londoño

Doctor en Estudios de Comunicación, línea de Retórica y Cultura, Ohio University, EU.. Profesor Titular de la Escuela de Comunicación Social y Periodismo de la Universidad de Manizales.


Embrace of the Serpent is a 2015 Colombian film directed by Ciro Guerra. In this paper, I present an analysis of the film through a postcolonial framework to answer an overarching question: How is the colonial power assimilated and contested? The answer addresses two intersecting dimensions. First, I examine the four main characters and their relationship with Homi Bhabha´s notion of the “in-between” spaces produced by the articulation of differences between the colonizer and the colonized. I argue that each one of these characters represents a different degree or form of “in-betweenness.” Second, I look at the consequences of colonialism through the presence of Catholic Missions and rubber plantations in the Amazon. I claim that the film frames religious and economic ideologies as acting together in constituting renewed bodies and territories through the destruction of different forms of being in the world. Overall, Embrace of the Serpent offers a polychromatic screen to analyze the intersection of conceptual frameworks that are central to address the questions that emerge from postcolonial scholarship.


Article visits 293 | PDF visits 265


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Bhabha, H. (2004). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
  2. Chawla, D. (2017). Othering and Otherness. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1-9). John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Fanon, F. (1994). Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press.
  4. Fernandes, L. (2013). Transnational Feminism in the United States: Knowledge, Ethics, Power. New York University Press.
  5. Gómez-Barris, M. (2017). The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Duke University Press.
  6. Guerra, C. (Director). (2015). The Embrace of the Serpent [Motion picture]. Bogotá: Buffalo Films.
  7. Lechuga, M. (2020). An Anticolonial Future: Reassembling the Way we do Rhetoric. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(4), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829659
  8. Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism/Postcolonialism. Routledge.
  9. Rodriguez, A. (2017). A New Rhetoric for a Decolonial World. Postcolonial Studies, 20(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2017.1361309
  10. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
  11. Spivak, G. (2009). Can the Subaltern Speak? In R. Morris (Ed.), Can the Subalterns speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea (pp. 274-313). Columbia University Press