Audiovisual conference technology in qualitative research: Lessons learned from conducting a descriptive study during the COVID-19 pandemic
Tecnologías de videoconferencia en la investigación cualitativa: Lecciones aprendidas de un estudio descriptivo en tiempos de la pandemia por COVID-19
How to Cite
Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Show authors biography
Semi-structured interviews are a research method that allows the researcher to solicit narrative accounts of in- dividual experiences. Researchers use online semi-structured interviews for data collection in qualitative stud- ies, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic. This article reflects on and contribute to the ongoing debate about the implementation of online semi-structured interviews. Drawing on the researcher’s own experiences from conducting the study “Voting Matters: An Analysis of the Use of Electoral-Assistive Devices through the Lens of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”,2 she discusses four main aspects of online semi-structured interviews implementation: (a) using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) as an adaptation and methodological alternative to conducting interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic; (b) brief content-based literature recommendations for using VoIP in qualitative research; (c) use of the Zoom platform; and (d) key lessons learned from using Zoom for individual and focus group coordination and im- plementation. This article concludes that VoIP is a promising technology to host individual and focus group interviews for a qualitative study. Lessons learned might be helpful to researchers considering VoIP to collect individual and focus group data in qualitative research, mainly during the coordination phase.
Article visits 354 | PDF visits 383
Downloads
- Bertrand, C. & Bourdeau, L. (2010). Research interviews by Skype: A new data collection method.
- In J. Esteves (Ed.), Proceedings from the 9th European Conference on Research Methods (pp
- 70-79). Spain: IE Business School.
- Elixmann, D., Marcus, S., & Wernick, D. (2008). The Regulation of Voice over IP (VoIP) in Europe.
- Cullen International. Wik Consult.
- Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N.K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S.E. (2015). Finding the Hidden Participant:
- Solutions for Recruiting Hidden, Hard-to-Reach, and Vulnerable Populations. International
- Journal of Qualitative Methods SAGE, 14(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621420
- Gest, J. (2015). Voice over Internet Protocol: Laying to rest the biggest concerns and misconceptions
- about VoIP. Smart Business Columbus, 24(2), 46-48.
- Høybråten, H.M. & Garrels, V. (2018). Facilitating qualitative research interviews for respondents
- with intellectual disability. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(5), 692–706.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1413802
- James, N. & Busher, H. (2016). Online Interviewing. In Silverman, D. (Ed), Qualitative Research
- Methods (pp. 245-259). SAGE Publications Inc.
- King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. M. (2019). Interviews in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage
- Publications.
- Klykken F. H. (2021). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research.
- https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366
- Kroll, T., Rosaline, B., & Harris, J. (2007). Using Focus Groups in Disability Research 17 Qualitative
- Health Research, 17(5), 690-698. https://doi: 10.1177/1049732307301488
- Morgan, D. (2011). Focus groups as a qualitative method (3rd ed.). SAGE Research Methods Online
- Publications.
- Nehls, K., Smith, B., & Schneider, H. (2014). Video-Conferencing Interviews in Qualitative Research.
- In Hai-Jew, S (Ed), Enhancing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research with Technology (pp.
- 140-157). Information Science Reference. IGI Global.
- O’Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2003), “Focus groups in cyberspace”: using the Internet for qualitative research.
- Qualitative Market Research, 6(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470190
- Packer M.J., (2011). The Science of Qualitative Research (1st ed.) Cambridge University Press.
- Reid, D.J. & Reid, F.J.M (2005). Online focus groups: an in-depth comparison of computer-mediated
- and conventional focus group discussions. International Journal of Market Research, 47(2),
- 131-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700204
- Roulston, K. (2019). Interactional studies of qualitative research interviews. (1st ed) John Benjamins
- Publishing Company.
- Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting An Online Focus Group. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 761-
- 765. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1179
- Thelwall, M. & Nevill, T. (2021). Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now?
- Interviews, case studies, focus groups and etnographies. Library and Information Science Research,
- 43(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094
- Vindrola-Padros, C., Chisnall, G., Cooper, S., Dowrick, A., Djellouli, N., Mulcahy Symmons, S.,
- Martin, S., Singleton, G., Vanderslott, S., Vera, N., & Johnson, G. (2020) Carrying Out Rapid
- Qualitative Research During a Pandemic: Emerging Lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative
- Health Research, 30(14), 2192-2204. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732320951526
- VoIP.org. (2021, November 1st). What is VoIP? https://www.voip-info.org/what-is-voip/
- Weller, S. (2017). Using Internet Video Calls in Qualitative (Longitudinal) Interviews: Some Implications
- for Rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613-625.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505
- Wettergren, L., Eriksson, L.E., Nilsson, J., Jervaeus, A., & Lampic, Claudia (2016). Online Focus
- Group Discussion is a Valid and Feasible Mode When Investigating Sensitive Topics Among
- Young Persons with a Cancer Experience. JMIR Research Protocols, 5(1), 1-5. https://doi:
- 10.2196/resprot.5616
- Woodyatt, C.R., Finneran, C.A., & Stephenson, R. (2016). In-person versus online focus group discussions:
- a comparative analysis of data quality. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 741-749.
- https://doi.org/ 10.1177/104973231663151
