Critical Education vs. Education for rent: a false dilemma?
Critical Education vs. Education for rent: a false dilemma?
How to Cite
Download Citation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Show authors biography
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Andrés Francisco Olivar Rojas, Política, medios y ciudadanía: hacia la redefinición de las relaciones de poder desde el periodismo ciudadano , Escribanía: Vol. 12 No. 1 (17)
- Andrés Francisco Olivar Rojas, El terrorismo como palabra y acción. Complejizar el objeto para entender las dinámicas de los conflictos contemporáneos , Escribanía: Vol. 12 No. 2 (17)
- Andrés Francisco Olivar Rojas, Educación crítica vs. educación para la renta: ¿Un falso dilema? , Escribanía: Vol. 16 No. 1 (21)
- Andrés Francisco Olivar Rojas, Contingencia vs. transversalidad, o sobre la debilidad del Estado de derecho , Escribanía: Vol. 14 No. 1 (19)
This paper outlines the discussion about critical education or education for
development concepts, explained by different authors. According to diverse
conceptualizations, education for development must focus in building revealing
discourses of power and their relationships between the hegemonical north,
whose epistemologies meet economical logics of globalized countries, and
the hegemonized south, whose epistemologies meet development models
unconnected to power cores of center countries. In that sense, arise in Latin
America, a dichotomy about the model development choice. In front of this,
appears Martha Nussbaum’s theory about education centered in humanities
as a likely way out to the exposed dilemma.
Article visits 90 | PDF visits 59
Downloads
Information
