Líneas de investigación y perspectivas futuras de los estudios organizacionales: una revisión

Líneas de investigación y perspectivas futuras de los estudios organizacionales: una revisión Lines of research and future perspectives in organizational studies: a review

Publicado 2024-09-17


https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4899.2024
Abrir | Descargar
PDF FLIP HTML EPUB
Número
Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2024): Volumen 25(1)
Sección
Artículo de investigación científica
Cómo citar
Mejía Franco, N., Ramirez Cardona, A. . ., & Ocampo Garcia , X. . (2024). Líneas de investigación y perspectivas futuras de los estudios organizacionales: una revisión: Lines of research and future perspectives in organizational studies: a review. Lúmina, 25(1), E0055. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4899.2024
Descargar cita
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4899.2024
Dimensions
PlumX

Cómo citar

Mejía Franco, N., Ramirez Cardona, A. . ., & Ocampo Garcia , X. . (2024). Líneas de investigación y perspectivas futuras de los estudios organizacionales: una revisión: Lines of research and future perspectives in organizational studies: a review. Lúmina, 25(1), E0055. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v25.n1.4899.2024

Descargar cita

Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Natalia Mejía Franco
Universidad de Manizales
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3738-6384 ORCID
Adriana Ramirez Cardona
Universidad de Manizales
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-2999 ORCID
Ximena Ocampo garcia
Universidad de Manizales
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-5511 ORCID
Mostrar biografía de los autores

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

Este artículo de revisión tiene como objetivo principal proponer líneas de investigación y perspectivas futuras en los estudios organizacionales. Lo anterior se logra por medio de una revisión narrativa y bibliométrica para las que se usaron Tree of Science y Bibliosiny respectivamente, a partir de una consulta en la base de datos de Scopus donde se encontraron 1091 documentos que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Estos documentos fueron procesados con Bibliometrix, y VosViewer y que se redujeron a 327 para ser procesados en ToS. Las principales líneas de investigación identificadas fueron: a) Liderazgo y gestión del cambio organizacional; b) Entornos laborales cambiantes, diversos e inclusivos; c) Legitimación, sostenibilidad y responsabilidad organizacional. Esta revisión muestra que los estudios organizacionales nacen como alternativa para analizar el fenómeno organizacional de manera alternativa a las perspectivas tradicionales; de igual manera, este es un campo de conocimiento interdisciplinar en el que aparecen importantes aportes desde la psicología, la antropología y la sociología. Además, lo estudios organizacionales tienen el reto de realizar análisis adecuados, con métodos apropiados para interpretar el fenómeno organizacional de una manera crítica y pertinente. Por lo tanto, este documento contribuye al desarrollo de la literatura en estudios organizacionales al animar a los investigadores a hacer estudios interdisciplinares.

Visitas del artículo 440 | Visitas PDF 234

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Adams, R. J., Smart, P., y Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102
  2. Alvesson, M., y Deetz, S. (2006). 1.7 critical theory and postmodernism approaches to organizational studies. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage Publications, 255-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199286072.003.0006
  3. Al Yami, M., Ajmal, M. M., y Balasubramanian, S. (2022). Does size matter? The effects of public sector organizational size’on knowledge management processes and operational efficiency. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(5), 670-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2020-0123
  4. Albert, S., Whetten, D. A., Cummings, L. L., y Staw, B. M. (1985). Organizational identity. En: B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, Eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 263-295. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-02640-001
  5. Andreini, D. y Bettinelli, C. (2017). Systematic literature review. Business Model Innovation: From Systematic Literature Review to Future Research Directions, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9388-2
  6. Aria, M., y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  7. Arghode, V., Jandu, N., y McLean, G. N. (2020). Exploring the connection between organizations and organisms in dealing with change. European Journal of Training and Development, 45(4/5), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2020-0095
  8. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., y Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative science studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  9. Bager, A. S., y Mølholm, M. (2020). A methodological framework for organizational discourse activism: An ethics of dispositif and dialogue. Philosophy of Management, 19(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-019-00124-x
  10. Bailey, D. E., y Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144
  11. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  12. Bitektine, A., y Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of management review, 40(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0318
  13. Bo, L., Böhm, S., y Reynolds, N. S. (2019). Organizing the environmental governance of the rare-earth industry: China’s passive revolution. Organization Studies, 40(7), 1045-1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782278
  14. Bowden, B. (2021). The historic (wrong) turn in management and organizational studies. Journal of Management History, 27(1), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-06-2020-0037
  15. Brown, J. S., y Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science, 12(2), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
  16. Castillo, C. (2022). Six emotional stages of organisational change: Conceptualisation and scale development. Economics & Sociology, 15(1), 253-267. https://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-1/16
  17. Chen, C., Dubin, R., y Schultz, T. (2015). Science mapping. En Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (3rd ed., pp. 4171-4184). igi Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch410
  18. Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A. M., y Nazareno, E. (2014). Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: Challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership. Organization, 21(5), 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414539784
  19. Clark, P., y Rowlinson, M. (2007). The treatment of history in organisation studies: towards an ‘historic turn’?. Business history, 46(3), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007679042000219175
  20. Clegg, R. S., Hardy, C., y Nord, R. W. (1997). Handbook of organisation studies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(9), 962-962. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600886
  21. Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., Testa, F., y De Giacomo, M. R. (2018). The influence of managerial satisfaction on corporate environmental performance and reputation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2177
  22. David, R. J., y Han, S. K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic management journal, 25(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.359
  23. de Oliveira, T. Z. G. D., Pereira, R. D., Carrieri, A. D. P., y Correia, G. F. A. (2021). Moving memories: Stories of the Tina Martins shelter in the fight against gender violence. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210402
  24. Dellagnelo, E. H. L., Böhm, S., y Mendonça, P. M. E. D. (2014). Organizing resistance movements: contribution of the political discourse theory. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020140203
  25. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of management review, 21(3), 619-654. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9702100310
  26. DiMaggio, P. J., y Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  27. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., y Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  28. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., y Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  29. Echeverri-Rubio A. y Vieira-Salazar J. A. (2019). Tendencias en la investigación sobre Gobernanza de Socio-ecosistemas: caminos para nuevas investigaciones. Lúmina, 20, 76-100. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.20.2717.2019
  30. Echeverri-Rubio A. y Vieira-Salazar, J. A. (2022). Tendencias en la investigación del turismo sostenible en Latinoamérica y el Caribe: un análisis bibliométrico. Revista Universidad & Empresa, 24(42), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.11131
  31. Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., y Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688
  32. Gioia, D. A., y Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of management review, 15(4), 584-602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
  33. Giorgi, S., y Nielsen, R. P. (2020). Social Situational Business Ethics Framing for Engaging with Ethics Issues. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 39(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201911788
  34. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023619503005
  35. Gomes, J. F., Marques, T., y Cabral, C. (2022). Responsible leadership, organizational commitment, and work engagement: The mediator role of organizational identification. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21502
  36. Gonzales, D. R. y Ramírez, G. (2017). Introducción: Los estudios organizacionales en Latinoamérica. Una realidad fragmentada en busca de una identidad. En: Tratado de Estudios Organizacionales. Vol. 1. Teorización sobre el campo. Ed. EAFIT. http://hdl.handle.net/10784/24687
  37. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., y Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
  38. Guimaraes, T. A., Guarido Filho, E. R., y Luz, B. B. D. C. (2020). Courts as organizations: Governance and legitimacy. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 17. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200032
  39. Heller, M. (2023). Rethinking historical methods in organization studies: Organizational source criticism. Organization Studies, 44(6), 987-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231156
  40. Hjorth, D., y Dawson, A. (2016). The burden of history in the family business organization. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1089-1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615613375
  41. Ibarra-Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4), 463-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840606585
  42. Ibarra, E. (2006). Estudios Organizacionales en América Latina. Transitando del centro a las orillas. En: De la Garza, E (ed.). Teorias sociales y estudios del trabajo. Nuevos Enfoques. Mexico, Anthropos, UAM-I, pp. 88-107 https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2109611
  43. Jermier, J. M., y Forbes, L. C. (2016). Metaphors, organizations and water: Generating new images for environmental sustainability. Human Relations, 69(4), 1001-1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715616469
  44. Kelem, M. y Hassard, J. (2003). Paradigm plurality: exploring past, present, and future trends. En: Westwood, R y Clegg, S (eds), Debating organization. Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. Londres, Blackwell, pp. 73-82. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Debating+Organization%3A+Point+Counterpoint+in+Organization+Studies-p-9780631216933
  45. Köseoglu, M. A. (2016). Mapping the institutional collaboration network of strategic management research: 1980–2014. Scientometrics 109, 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1894-5
  46. Kostova, T., Nell, P. C., y Hoenen, A. K. (2018). Understanding agency problems in headquarters-subsidiary relationships in multinational corporations: A contextualized model. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2611-2637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316648383
  47. Marciano, C., Brizio, A., Carpaneto, A., Giachino, M., Robiati, A., y Molino, M. (2022). Innovative Spirits. An empirical research on personal characteristics and work behavior of innovators in Italy. SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO, (162), 229-250. https://dx.doi.org/10.3280/SL2022-162011
  48. March, J.G. (2007). The study of organizations and organizing since 1945. Organizations Studies, vol. 28, num. 1, pp.9-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406070752
  49. Marshall, D. R., y Novicevic, M. M. (2016). Legitimizing the social enterprise: development of a conformance framework based on a genealogical pragmatic analysis. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2016.1151362
  50. Matitz, Q. R. S., Chaerki, K. F., y Chaerki, S. F. (2021). Theorizing relations between past, present and future: Interactions between process and historical organizational studies through whitehead’s process philosophy. Philosophy of Management, 20(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-020-00151-z
  51. Meyer, J. W., y Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37354-2_15
  52. Mills, A. J. (2017). Organization, gender, and culture. In Insights and Research on the Study of Gender and Intersectionality in International Airline Cultures (pp. 15-33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-545-020171002
  53. Mills, A. J., y Williams, K. S. (2021). Feminist frustrations: The enduring neglect of a women’s business history and the opportunity for radical change. Business History, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2021.1896706
  54. Mintzberg, H., y Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic management journal, 6(3), 257-272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486186
  55. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M.,y Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  56. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., y Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
  57. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
  58. Parker, S., y Parker, M. (2017). Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in Critical Management Studies: Alternative organizations as allies. Human Relations, 70(11), 1366-1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717696135
  59. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., y Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business ethics quarterly, 13(4), 479-502. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313434
  60. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., y Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  61. Ramírez, G, Vargas, A y De la Rosa, A. (2011). Estudios Organizacionales y Administración. Contrastes y complementariedades: caminando hacia el eslabón perdido. Forum Doctoral, vol. 3, núm. 3, pp. 7-54 https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/forum-doctoral/article/view/2771/2580
  62. Roquebert, C. I., y Debucquet, G. (2022). Imagining beyond nature-culture dualism: An exploration of ecological justice. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221098249
  63. Schaffer, B. S., y Riordan, C. M. (2003). A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational research methods, 6(2), 169-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103251542
  64. Schmutz, J. B., Bienefeld, N., Maynard, M. T., y Rico, R. (2023). Exceeding the Ordinary: A Framework for Examining Teams Across the Extremeness Continuum and Its Impact on Future Research. Group & Organization Management, https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221150756
  65. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family business review, 17(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x
  66. Shenhav, Y. (2009). The historical and epistemological foundations of organization theory: fusing sociological theory with engineering discourse. En: Tsoukas, H y Knudsen,C (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. Oxford, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, pp. 183-209 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199275250.003.0007
  67. Sheppard, J. P., y Young, J. (2020). Addressing sustainable development goals for confronting climate change: Insights and summary solutions in the stress stupidity system. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(6), 929-951. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2020.9
  68. Spicer, A., y Böhm, S. (2007). Moving management: Theorizing struggles against the hegemony of management. Organization studies, 28(11), 1667-1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606082219
  69. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., y Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  70. White, P. E. (1974). Intra-and inter-organizational studies: Do they require separate conceptualizations?. Administration & Society, 6(1), 107-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977400600
  71. Valencia-Hernández, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque-Méndez, N. D., & OlivarTost, G. (2020). SAP algorithm for citation analysis: An improvement to tree of science. Ingeniería e investigación, 40(1), 45-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
  72. Xiu, L., Lu, F., y Liang, X. (2020). Legitimized identity vs identifiable legitimacy: Toward a theoretical framework of the relationship between organizational identity and organizational legitimacy. Nankai Business Review International, 11(1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-03-2019-0009
  73. Zeidan, S., Prentice, C., y Nguyen, M. (2022). Securing jobs with individual trait and organisational support?. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, (ahead-ofprint). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2021-3076

Información

Perfil de Google Scholar

Indexación
DIRECTORIOS

PKP INDEX

LATIN REV

CAPES

BASE

OAJI

ECONBIZ

MIAR

BASE

SCILIT         

WORLDCAT

CROSSREF 

CIRC

EZB LIBRARY

 

Palabras clave

Código QR

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |