Approach to a Departmental Economic Development Index in Colombia

Aproximación a un Índice de Desarrollo Económico Departamental en Colombia

Published 2024-06-14


https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v24.n1.4848.2023
Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
Issue
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023): Volumen 24(1)
Section
Artículo de investigación científica
How to Cite
Barrera Escobar, A. (2024). Approach to a Departmental Economic Development Index in Colombia. Lúmina, 24(1), E0033. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v24.n1.4848.2023
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
DOI

https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v24.n1.4848.2023
Dimensions
PlumX

How to Cite

Barrera Escobar, A. (2024). Approach to a Departmental Economic Development Index in Colombia. Lúmina, 24(1), E0033. https://doi.org/10.30554/lumina.v24.n1.4848.2023

Download Citation

license
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Composite indices represent an instrument to make measurements of complex phenomena useful for making public policy decisions in the territories. In this research, the methodological conceptualization of a subnational economic development index in Colombia was advanced, taking the 32 departments and the capital, from a theoretical position of historical and dynamic changes in societies based on the pillars of the transformation of economic structures, and its socioeconomic effects, the theory of modernity from the penetration of information and communication technologies, and the theory of demographic transition. The results are satisfactory because they show the gaps within the country and there are strong correlations with composite indices developed by other national institutions and variables not included in the estimate that complement the concept of economic development such as the business fabric, workers' income, the education levels of the population, fiscal capacities and some indicators of subjective well-being. Its main limitation is a small approach in the number of variables that can omit other dimensions of development, in this case unobservable factors and that would explain the low correlation of the index with other variables.

Article visits 417 | PDF visits 172

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1990). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60 (2), 323-351.
  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. W. (2008). The economics of growth. MIT press.
  3. Banco Mundial (2017). Doing Business en Colombia 2017. URL: https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/es/reports/subnational-reports/colombia
  4. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The quarterly journal of economics, 106(2), 407-443. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943
  5. Cameron, R. & Neal, L. (2014). Historia económica mundial. Desde el Paleolítico hasta el presente. Alianza Editorial.
  6. Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. The Review of economic studies, 32(3), 233-240. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2295827
  7. CPC (2019a). Índice Departamental de Competitividad 2019. Consejo Privado de Competitividad. URL: https://compite.com.co/indice-departamental-de-competitividad/
  8. CPC (2019b). Índice de Competitividad de Ciudades 2019. Consejo Privado de Competitividad. URL: https://compite.com.co/indice-de-competitividad-de-ciudades/
  9. Cornell University, INSEAD & WIPO (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating Healthy Lives—The Future of Medical Innovation. URL: https://www.wipo.int/publications/es/details.jsp?id=4434
  10. Coyle, D. (2017). El producto interno bruto: Una historia breve pero entrañable. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  11. Davis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237(1), 1-11.
  12. DNP (2019). Índice Departamental de Innovación para Colombia IDIC 2019. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología. URL: https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Prensa/Indice-Departamental-Innovacion-Colombia-2019.pdf
  13. Deaton, A. (2015). El gran escape: salud, riqueza y los orígenes de la desigualdad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  14. Domar, E. (1946). Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. Econometrica. 14 (2): 137-147. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1905364
  15. Fundación Corona, Red de Ciudades Cómo Vamos, Social Progress Imperative & Deloitte (2022). Reporte metodológico y de resultados del índice de progreso social para 15 ciudades de Colombia 2016-2020. URL: https://redcomovamos.org/2022/05/05/mayo-2022-resultados-5ta-version-indice-de-progreso-social-de-ciudades-ips-ciudades-2021/
  16. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European economic review, 35(2-3), 517-526. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
  17. Joint Research Centre-European Commission. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD publishing. URL: https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/handbookonconstructingcompositeindicatorsmethodologyanduserguide.htm
  18. Harlem, B. G. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.
  19. Harrod, R. F. (1939). An essay in dynamic theory. The economic journal, 49(193), 14-33. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2225181
  20. Howitt, P., & Aghion, P. (1998). Capital accumulation and innovation as complementary factors in long-run growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 111-130.
  21. Kalmanovitz, S., & López, E. (2004). Patrones de desarrollo y fuentes de crecimiento de la agricultura. Borradores de economía, 288, 1-45. URL: https://www.banrep.gov.co/docum/ftp/borra288.pdf
  22. Koopmans, T. C. (1963). On the concept of optimal economic growth.
  23. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review, 45(1), 1-28.
  24. Landreth, H. & Colander, D. (2006). Historia del pensamiento económico. McGraw-Hill
  25. Landry, A. (1909). Les trois théories principales de la population. Scientia, 3(6).
  26. Landry, A. (1934). La révolution démographique. Paris: Sirey.
  27. Latouche, S. (2005). Come sopravvivere allo sviluppo. Dalla decolonizzazione dell'immaginario economico alla costruzione di una società alternativa. Bollati Boringhieri.
  28. Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and development Review, 411-435. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1973316
  29. Lesthaeghe, R. (1991). The second demographic transition in Western Countries: an interpretation (pp. 199-2). Interuniversity Programme in Demography. URL: http://interfacedemography.be/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/WP-IPD-1991-2.pdf
  30. Lesthaeghe, R. (1994). Una interpretación sobre la segunda transición demográfica en los países occidentales. Demografía y políticas públicas, 9-60.
  31. Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(51), 18112-18115. URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/111/51/18112.short
  32. Lewis, W. A. (1957). Teoría del desarrollo económico. El Trimestre Económico, 24(96 (4), 454-467. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23394778?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  33. López, L. M., & Cobos, E. P. (2008). Desindustrialización, terciarización y estructura metropolitana: un debate conceptual necesario. Cuadernos del CENDES, 25(69), 21-45. URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/403/40311392003.pdf
  34. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3-42. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
  35. Manzano, F. & Velázquez, G. (2018). Población y economía: recorrido histórico del estado del arte. Instituto de Geografía, Historia y Ciencias Sociales (IGEHCS), Universidad Nacional del Centro / CONICET.
  36. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth.
  37. Naciones Unidas (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL. URL: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf
  38. Notestein, F. W. (1945). Population-The long view. Food for the World, 36-57.
  39. Notestein, F. W. (1952). The economics of population and food supplies (No. 976-2016-77014).
  40. PNUD (2019). Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2019. Más allá del ingreso, más allá de los promedios, más allá del presente: Desigualdades del desarrollo humano en el siglo XXI. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo URL: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2019_overview_-_spanish.pdf
  41. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 73, 91.
  42. Porter, M. E. (2007). La ventaja competitiva de las naciones. Harvard business review, 85(11), 69-95.
  43. Ramírez, J. C. & de Aguas, J. M. P. (2017). Escalafón de la competitividad de los departamentos de Colombia 2017. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Oficina de la CEPAL en Bogotá URL: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43156/1/S1800010_es.pdf
  44. Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The economic journal, 38(152), 543-559. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
  45. Rebelo, S. (1991). Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. Journal of political Economy, 99(3), 500-521. URL:
  46. Ritchie, Roser, Mispy & Ortiz-Ospina. (2018). Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. SDG-Tracker.org, website. URL: https://sdg-tracker.org/
  47. Romer, P. M. (1983). Dynamic competitive equilibria with externalities, increasing returns, and unbounded growth. The University of Chicago.
  48. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  49. Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. The American Economic Review, 77(2), 56-62.
  50. Romer, P. M. (1991). El cambio tecnológico endógeno. El trimestre económico, 58(231 (3), 441-480.
  51. Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic perspectives, 8(1), 3-22. DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.1.3.
  52. Roncaglia, A. (2017). A brief history of economic thought. Cambridge University Press.
  53. Sachs, J. D., & Vernis, R. V. (2015). La era del desarrollo sostenible. Deusto.
  54. Sachs, J. D., & López, V. P. (2021). Las edades de la globalización. Deusto.
  55. Sala-i-Martin, X. (2000). Apuntes de crecimiento económico. Antoni Bosch.
  56. Samuels, W. J., Biddle, J. E., & Davis, J. B. (Eds.). (2008). A companion to the history of economic thought. John Wiley & Sons.
  57. Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 219-231.
  58. Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y Libertad. Planeta.
  59. Sen, A. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. Poverty and inequality, 30-46.
  60. Serna, C. (2004). Desarrollo sostenible, economía ambiental y economía ecológica. Universidad de Manizales.
  61. Social Progress Imperative (2019). Social Progress Index 2019. Executive Summary. URL: https://www.socialprogress.org/assets/downloads/resources/2019/2019-Social-Progress-Index-executive-summary-v2.0.pdf
  62. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  63. Stern, S. & Epner, T. (2019). Social Progress Index 2019. Methodology Summary. Social Progress Imperative. URL: https://www.socialprogress.org/assets/downloads/resources/2019/2019-Social-Progress-Index-Methodology-Report.pdf
  64. Thompson, W. S. (1929). Population. American Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 959–975.
  65. Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population bulletin, 42(1), 1-59.
  66. Van de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 27, 290-331. URL: https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/41465/5/74.pdf
  67. Van de Kaa, D. J. (2002). The idea of a second demographic transition in industrialized countries. Birth, 35, 45. URL: http://websv.ipss.go.jp/webj-ad/WebJournal.files/population/2003_4/Kaa.pdf
  68. WEF (2019). Global Competitiveness Report 2019. World Economic Forum. URL: https://es.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2019
  69. Weller, J. (2004). El empleo terciario en América Latina: entre la modernidad y la sobrevivencia. Revista de la CEPAL 84, (159-176). URL: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/10982
  70. Welti, C. (1997). Demografía I. México DF: Programa Latinoamericano de Actividades en Población, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. ISBN: 968-6605-22-3.
  71. World Bank (2020). Doing Business 2020. URL: https://espanol.doingbusiness.org/es/reports/global-reports/doing-business-2020

Information

Perfil de Google Scholar

Indexación
DIRECTORIOS

PKP INDEX

LATIN REV

CAPES

BASE

OAJI

ECONBIZ

MIAR

BASE

SCILIT         

WORLDCAT

CROSSREF 

CIRC

EZB LIBRARY

 

Keywords

QR code