Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

The stifling embrace of the colonial power:Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversionof life in the film Embrace of the Serpent

The stifling embrace of the colonial power: Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversion of life in the film Embrace of the Serpent




Sección
Forjadores: Artículos de Investigación

Cómo citar
López Londoño, L. M. (2025). The stifling embrace of the colonial power:Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversionof life in the film Embrace of the Serpent. Escribanía, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/escribania.v23i1.5378
Descargar cita

Dimensions
PlumX

Cómo citar

López Londoño, L. M. (2025). The stifling embrace of the colonial power:Otherness, in-betweenness, and conversionof life in the film Embrace of the Serpent. Escribanía, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.30554/escribania.v23i1.5378

Descargar cita

Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Luis Miguel López Londoño

Luis Miguel López Londoño

Doctor en Estudios de Comunicación, línea de Retórica y Cultura, Ohio University, EU.. Profesor Titular de la Escuela de Comunicación Social y Periodismo de la Universidad de Manizales.


Embrace of the Serpent is a 2015 Colombian film directed by Ciro Guerra. In this paper, I present an analysis of the film through a postcolonial framework to answer an overarching question: How is the colonial power assimilated and contested? The answer addresses two intersecting dimensions. First, I examine the four main characters and their relationship with Homi Bhabha´s notion of the “in-between” spaces produced by the articulation of differences between the colonizer and the colonized. I argue that each one of these characters represents a different degree or form of “in-betweenness.” Second, I look at the consequences of colonialism
through the presence of Catholic Missions and rubber plantations in the Amazon. I claim that the film frames religious and economic ideologies as acting together in constituting renewed bodies and territories through the destruction of different forms of being in the world. Overall, Embrace of the Serpent offers a polychromatic screen to analyze the intersection of conceptual frameworks that are central to address the questions that emerge from postcolonial scholarship.


Visitas del artículo 172 | Visitas PDF 90


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Bhabha, H. (2004). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
  2. Chawla, D. (2017). Othering and Otherness. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1-9). John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Fanon, F. (1994). Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press.
  4. Fernandes, L. (2013). Transnational Feminism in the United States: Knowledge, Ethics, Power. New York University Press.
  5. Gómez-Barris, M. (2017). The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Duke University Press.
  6. Guerra, C. (Director). (2015). The Embrace of the Serpent [Motion picture]. Bogotá: Buffalo Films.
  7. Lechuga, M. (2020). An Anticolonial Future: Reassembling the Way we do Rhetoric. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(4), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829659
  8. Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism/Postcolonialism. Routledge.
  9. Rodriguez, A. (2017). A New Rhetoric for a Decolonial World. Postcolonial Studies, 20(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2017.1361309
  10. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
  11. Spivak, G. (2009). Can the Subaltern Speak? In R. Morris (Ed.), Can the Subalterns speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea (pp. 274-313). Columbia University Press
Sistema OJS 3.4.0.10 - Metabiblioteca |