<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!-- Created from PDF via Acrobat SaveAsXML -->
<!-- Mapping Table version: 28-February-2003 -->
<TaggedPDF-doc>
<?xpacket begin='﻿' id='W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d'?>
<?xpacket begin="﻿" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>
<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 9.1-c001 79.675d0f7, 2023/06/11-19:21:16        ">
   <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
      <rdf:Description rdf:about=""
            xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/"
            xmlns:stRef="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/sType/ResourceRef#"
            xmlns:stEvt="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/sType/ResourceEvent#"
            xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/"
            xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
            xmlns:pdf="http://ns.adobe.com/pdf/1.3/">
         <xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:1de7d18a-719c-4b88-8aee-457eca9c8118</xmpMM:InstanceID>
         <xmpMM:OriginalDocumentID>adobe:docid:indd:248e5273-8654-11df-a1f3-bcde804a6a19</xmpMM:OriginalDocumentID>
         <xmpMM:DocumentID>xmp.id:08c26f64-da48-7143-bd22-04d11fa8b73a</xmpMM:DocumentID>
         <xmpMM:RenditionClass>proof:pdf</xmpMM:RenditionClass>
         <xmpMM:DerivedFrom rdf:parseType="Resource">
            <stRef:instanceID>xmp.iid:6efa38b8-034b-8a48-b7ea-1f2d7849f015</stRef:instanceID>
            <stRef:documentID>xmp.did:a005a0b6-820b-5147-9a27-87b70e0686ab</stRef:documentID>
            <stRef:originalDocumentID>adobe:docid:indd:248e5273-8654-11df-a1f3-bcde804a6a19</stRef:originalDocumentID>
            <stRef:renditionClass>default</stRef:renditionClass>
         </xmpMM:DerivedFrom>
         <xmpMM:History>
            <rdf:Seq>
               <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource">
                  <stEvt:action>converted</stEvt:action>
                  <stEvt:parameters>from application/x-indesign to application/pdf</stEvt:parameters>
                  <stEvt:softwareAgent>Adobe InDesign 20.1 (Windows)</stEvt:softwareAgent>
                  <stEvt:changed>/</stEvt:changed>
                  <stEvt:when>2026-06-24T09:41:09-05:00</stEvt:when>
               </rdf:li>
            </rdf:Seq>
         </xmpMM:History>
         <xmp:CreateDate>2026-06-24T09:41:09-05:00</xmp:CreateDate>
         <xmp:ModifyDate>2026-06-24T09:41:09-05:00</xmp:ModifyDate>
         <xmp:MetadataDate>2026-06-24T09:41:09-05:00</xmp:MetadataDate>
         <xmp:CreatorTool>Adobe InDesign 20.1 (Windows)</xmp:CreatorTool>
         <dc:format>xml</dc:format>
         <pdf:Producer>Adobe PDF Library 17.0</pdf:Producer>
         <pdf:Trapped>False</pdf:Trapped>
      </rdf:Description>
   </rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
                           
<?xpacket end="w"?>
<?xpacket end='r'?>

<P>Archivos de Medicina </P>

<P>Reporte de Caso </P>

<Part>
<H1>Pharmacological transplacental cardioversion with digoxin in a hydropic foetus: a case report </H1>

<P>Jaime Andrés Pardo Romero1 , Cristian Hincapié Porras2, LeidyAlexandra Guzmán Polanía3, NataliaAndrea Torres Valencia4 </P>

<P>Recibido para publicaci: 26-11-2025. Versi corregida: 29-04-2026. Aprobado para publicaci: 03-06-2025. </P>

<P>Modelo de citación: Pardo Romero J.A., Hincapié Porras C., Guzmán Polanía L.A., Torres Valencia N.A. Cardioversión farmacológica transplacentaria con digoxina en un feto hidrópico: informe de un caso. Arch Med (Manizales). 2026;26(1). 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.26.1.5567.2026 </Link>
</P>

<Sect>
<H2>Abstract: </H2>

<P>Introduction: Fetal arrhythmias are conditions that occur in a small percentage of pregnancies, diagnosed incidentally via ultrasound. Most arrhythmias are fetal tachyarrhythmias, which can complicate the course of pregnancy, causing fetal heart failure and fetal hydrops in untreated cases and increasing rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: This is a 38-year-old patient, 27.6 weeks pregnant, who was admitted to a tertiary care facility following the detection of foetal tachycardia during an obstetric ultrasound scan. The foetal echocardiogram confirmed a tachyarrhythmia of the supraventricular tachycardia type and foetal hydrops, the latter finding due to the presence of ascites and pericardial effusion. Fetal structural anatomical pathology was ruled out; laboratory tests performed on the patient ruled out Rh incompatibility, thyroid disease and TORCH complex infections (toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes, syphilis, hepatitis B and HIV). Subsequently, transplacental pharmacological cardioversion with digoxin was performed, achieving a return to sinus rhythm and resolution of the hydrops after three weeks of treatment. This allowed the pregnancy to be carried to term at 37.0 weeks without any complications. Conclusion: Although the incidence of foetal arrhythmias is low, timely and e y diagnosis and treatment in institutions with trained staff can reduce perinatal complications and enable full-term pregnancies. Furthermore, the efficacy of digoxin as an antiarrhythmic agent was </P>

<P>1 Universidad Libre, Calí, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. ORCID: 
<Link>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1339-2818</Link>
. Correo: 
<Link>jaimea-pardor@unilibre.edu.co</Link>
. </P>

<P>2 Korial Group, Medicina Materno Fetal Integral, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia. ORCID: 
<Link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-6511</Link>
. Correo: 
<Link>cristianhincapie@gmail.com</Link>
. </P>

<P>3 Korial Group, Medicina Materno Fetal Integral, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia. ORCID: 
<Link>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6244-3392</Link>
. Correo: 
<Link>leidy.guzman@gmail.com</Link>
. </P>

<P>4 Korial Group, Medicina Materno Fetal Integral, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia. ORCID: 
<Link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-2847</Link>
. Correo: 
<Link>natorres@fucsalud.edu.co</Link>
. </P>

<Sect>
<H2>p. 1 </H2>

<P>demonstrated, even in hydropic foetuses where the return to sinus rhythm may take longer than usual compared to foetuses without foetal hydrops. </P>

<P>Keywords: Fetal arrhythmias, fetal supraventricular tachycardia, fetal hydrops. </P>

<P>Cardioversi farmacolica transplacentaria con digoxina en un feto hidrico: informe de un caso </P>
</Sect>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<H2>Resumen: </H2>

<P>Introducción: Las arritmias fetales son afecciones que se producen en un peque porcentaje de embarazos y que se diagnostican de forma incidental mediante eco-grafía. La mayoría de las arritmias son taquiarritmias fetales, que pueden complicar el curso del embarazo, provocando insuficiencia cardíaca fetal e hidropesía fetal en los casos no tratados, y aumentando las tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad perinatal. Presentación del caso: Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 38 as, con 27,6 semanas de gestaci, que ingresen un centro de atenci terciaria tras la detecci de taquicardia fetal en una ecografía obstétrica. La ecocardiografía fetal confirmuna taquiarritmia supraventricular e hidropesía fetal, este timo hallazgo evidenciado por la presencia de ascitis y derrame pericárdico. Se descartuna patología anatica estructural fetal, y las pruebas paraclínicas realizadas a la paciente descartaron incompatibilidad Rh, patología tiroidea e infecciones del complejo TORCH (toxoplasmosis, rubéola, citomegalovirus, herpes, sífilis, hepatitis B y VIH). Posteriormente, se realizuna cardioversi farmacolica transplacentaria con digoxina, logrando el retorno al ritmo sinusal y la resoluci del hidropesía tras tres semanas de tratamiento. Esto permitillevar el embarazo a término a las 37 semanas sin complicaciones. Conclusión:Aunque la incidencia de arritmias fetales es baja, el diagntico y el tratamiento oportunos en centros con personal capacitado reducen las complicaciones perinatales y permiten llevar los embarazos a término. Además, se demostrla eficacia de la digoxina como agente antiarrítmico, incluso en fetos con hidropesía, en los que el retorno al ritmo sinusal puede tardar más de lo habitual en comparaci con los fetos sin hidropesía fetal. </P>

<P>Palabras clave: Arritmias fetales, taquicardia supraventricular fetal, hidropesía fetal. </P>

<P>Cardioversão farmacolica transplacentária com digoxina num feto hidrico: relato de um caso </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<H2>Resumo: </H2>

<P>Introdução:As arritmias fetais são condiçs que ocorrem numa pequena percentagem de gravidezes e que são diagnosticadas de forma incidental através da ecografia. A maioria das arritmias são taquiarritmias fetais, que podem complicar o curso da gravidez, provocando insuficiência cardíaca fetal e hidropisia fetal nos casos não tratados, e aumentando as taxas de morbidade e mortalidade perinatal. Apresentação do caso: Apresentamos o caso de uma paciente de 38 anos, com 27,6 semanas de gestação, que deu entrada num centro de cuidados terciários ap a deteção de taquicardia fetal numa ecografia obstétrica. A ecocardiografia fetal confirmou uma taquiarritmia supraventricular e hidropisia fetal, este timo achado evidenciado pela presença de ascite e derrame pericárdico. Foi descartada uma patologia anatica estrutural fetal, e os exames paraclínicos realizados à paciente descartaram incompatibilidade Rh, patologia tireoidiana e infeçs do complexo TORCH (toxoplasmose, rubéola, citomegalovírus, herpes, sífilis, hepatite B e VIH). Posteriormente, foi realizada uma cardioversão farmacolica transplacentária com digoxina, conseguindo-se o retorno ao ritmo sinusal e a resolução da hidropisia ap três semanas de tratamento. Isto permitiu levar a gravidez a termo às 37 semanas sem complicaçs. Conclusão:Embora a incidência de arritmias fetais seja baixa, o diagntico e o tratamento oportunos em centros com pessoal qualificado reduzem as complicaçs perinatais e permitem levar as gravidezes a termo. Além disso, foi demonstrada a eficácia da digoxina como agente antiarrítmico, mesmo em fetos com hidropisia, nos quais o retorno ao ritmo sinusal pode demorar mais do que o habitual em comparação com fetos sem hidropisia fetal. </P>

<P>Palavras-chave: Arritmias fetais, taquicardia supraventricular fetal, hidropisia fetal. </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H2>Introduction </H2>
</Sect>

<P>Fetal arrhythmias are defined as an alteration in the rhythm of the cardiac cycle [1] diagnosed by ultrasound; they complicate up to 1% of pregnancies, the majority of which are due to benign conditions; however, tachyarrhythmias can cause haemodynamic decompensation, hydrops and foetal death [2]. Early detection in preterm pregnancies allows for the use of various antiarrhythmic drugs, which help prevent haemodynamic changes and restore sinus rhythm; however, in foetuses with hydrops, there may be no response or it may take a longer period of time to restore sinus rhythm. </P>

<Sect>
<H3>Patient details </H3>

<P>We present the case of a 38-year-old patient from a rural area, a housewife, with an obstetric history of G2C1V1, blood group A positive, at </P>

<P>27.6 weeks’ gestation according to a late-stage ultrasound scan, with no significant medical history. The patient was admitted to the A&amp;E department of a tertiary care hospital, asymptomatic, following findings of foetal tachycardia on an obstetric ultrasound scan. On admission to the obstetrics ward, foetal tachycardia (232 beats per minute) was confirmed by Doppler, with vital signs: blood pressure 114/78 mmHg, heart rate 72 beats per minute, respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute, oxygen saturation 98% (FiO2 21%), temperature 36.1°C. </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H3>Clinical findings </H3>

<P>Physical examination: fundal height 25 centimetres, no uterine activity, no uterine tenderness, foetal movements present, no amniorrhea, no genital bleeding and a body mass index of 23.1. </P>
</Sect>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H3>Diagnostic evaluation </H3>

<P>A foetal echocardiogram was performed, revealing no structural anatomical abnormalities, but showing supraventricular tachycardia with an atrioventricular ratio of 1:1 and a heart rate of 240 beats per minute (Figure 1), and foetal hydrops due to the presence of ascites and pericardial effusion (Figure 2); in addition, hydrocele and polyhydramnios. Admission laboratory results showed the following blood parameters: white blood cells 7,800 μL, C-reactive protein (CRP) at 0.3 mg/L, urine analysis and urine Gram stain non-pathological, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) at 2.7 mIU/L and free thyroxine (T4L) 1.1 ng/dl. TORCH complex infections (toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes, syphilis, hepatitis B and HIV) were ruled out to exclude other aetiologies of foetal hydrops. </P>
</Sect>

<P>Prior to the start of antiarrhythmic treatment, the patient underwent renal function tests, electrolyte tests, a transthoracic echocardiogram and a cardiology assessment; in the absence of contraindications and with diagnostic parameters within normal limits, pharmacological treatment with digoxin was initiated. </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<H3>Therapeutic intervention </H3>

<P>The patient was transferred to the obstetric intensive care unit; treatment was initiated with betamethasone to induce foetal maturation, and transplacental drug therapy with intravenous digoxin was started (loading dose of 0.5 mg every 8 hours for 4 days), under continuous maternal and foetal monitoring, due to the risk of digoxin toxicity. On day four, serum digoxin levels were measured and found to be within the therapeutic range (1.3 ng/ml), and the patient was subsequently switched to oral digoxin 0.25 mg/ e every 12 hours. She was subsequently transferred to the gynaecology and obstetrics ward, and a return to foetal sinus rhythm (Figure 3) was achieved within two weeks, with resolution of the hydrops four weeks after treatment began. She was discharged on oral digoxin at a dose of 0.25 mg orally every 12 hours and weekly follow-up in the outpatient clinic of the maternal-foetal medicine department until the end of the pregnancy at 37 weeks. </P>
<Figure>

<ImageData src="imagenes/Reporte de Caso-5567_img_0.png"/>
</Figure>

<P>Figure 1. Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound, 27.6-week pregnancy showing evidence of foetal tachycardia with a heart rate of 240 beats per minute. Four-chamber view. </P>
<Figure>

<ImageData src="imagenes/Reporte de Caso-5567_img_1.png"/>
</Figure>

<P>Figure 2. Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound, 27.6 weeks’ gestation. In the image on the left, showing a cross-section of the foetal abdomen, ascites is observed; in the image on the right, pericardial effusion is observed in the four-chamber view, findings consistent with foetal hydrops. </P>
<Figure>

<ImageData src="imagenes/Reporte de Caso-5567_img_2.png"/>
</Figure>

<P>Figure 3. Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound, 29.5 weeks’ gestation, showing a foetus with a normal foetal heart rate in the four-chamber view, following initiation of digoxin therapy. </P>
</Sect>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<H2>Follow-up and results Discussion </H2>

<P>During outpatient clinical and ultrasound follow-up by the maternal-foetal medicine department, the foetus remained in sinus rhythm, with normal foetal heart rates and no recurrence of foetal hydrops (Figure 4). The patient showed no intolerance or signs of digoxin toxicity. The pregnancy was terminated at 37.0 weeks by caesarean section due to a history of previous caesarean section. There were no complications during the caesarean section; a newborn was delivered with a normal heart rate, weighing over 2,500 grams, with adequate neonatal adaptation, no major malformations, and a normal postnatal echocardiogram. </P>

<P>This case involves a pregnant woman in whom foetal tachycardia was detected at 27.6 weeks, who subsequently developed foetal hydrops. The complexity of the case lies in the management of multiple conditions that posed a risk to both foetal and maternal well-being. </P>

<Sect>
<P>Fetal arrhythmias are defined as an irregular heart rhythm [1], with an abnormally low or high heart rate, known as fetal bradycardia or fetal tachycardia, respectively; however, the incidence of fetal arrhythmias is less than 2% of all pregnancies [2]. Most are diagnosed using ultrasound (obstetric ultrasound, Doppler) and foetal echocardiography. The latter is a fundamental tool for the prenatal assessment of the foetal heart, as it allows the majority of foetal arrhythmias to be distinguished with significant diagnostic accuracy [3]. </P>

<P>With regard to foetal tachycardias, the most common are sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia [4]; all typically have heart rates exceeding 200 beats per minute. Despite their low incidence, some of these arrhythmias are associated with high morbidity and mortality [5]; some may go </P>
</Sect>
<Figure>

<ImageData src="imagenes/Reporte de Caso-5567_img_3.png"/>
</Figure>

<P>Figure 4. Transabdominal obstetric ultrasound, 33.6 weeks’ gestation. The left-hand image shows a normal foetal heart rate (134 beats per minute) and resolution of the pericardial effusion in the four-chamber view; the right-hand image shows resolution of the ascites in a transverse view of the foetal abdomen. </P>

<P>undiagnosed and lead to up to 10% of foetal deaths, preterm birth [6] and foetal hydrops secondary to heart failure [7]. </P>

<P>Furthermore, foetal hydrops is defined as the excessive and pathological accumulation of fluid in two or more body cavities, including the peritoneal cavity, pleural space, pericardium and skin. Although placentomegaly and polyhydramnios tend to coexist, they are not part of the diagnostic criteria for this condition [8]. </P>

<P>The progression of foetal hydrops is usually rapid and progressive when it occurs at earlier gestational ages and in foetuses with higher heart rates. </P>

<P>With regard to foetal tachycardias, foetal supraventricular tachycardia accounts for more than two-thirds of foetal tachycardias, usually presenting at the end of the second trimester and the start of the third trimester [6]. It typically presents with heart rates between 220 and 320 beats per minute. The average time to return to sinus rhythm or cardioversion is approximately 6–7 days after the start of antiarrhythmic treatment [9]; however, in cases of foetal hydrops, the rate of cardioversion is slower [10]. </P>

<P>With regard to pharmacological therapy, it is indicated for foetuses with elevated heart rates persisting for more than 12 hours and a gestational age of less than 36 weeks; these should receive transplacental pharmacological therapy. Currently, three first-line drugs are used in the treatment of foetal supraventricular tachycardia: digoxin, flecainide and sotalol [11]. </P>

<P>Historically, flecainide and sotalol have shown greater efficacy than digoxin; however, recent evidence suggests that flecainide and digoxin have higher rates of return to sinus rhythm compared to sotalol [10], so the use of digoxin should be considered the first option in settings where other antiarrhythmics are not available, given its proven effectiveness. </P>

<P>Transplacental dosing does not always achieve adequate foetal concentrations; for this reason, the mother may require higher maternal doses or a combination of multiple antiarrhythmic drugs to control the foetal heart rate. </P>

<Sect>
<P>In cases of foetal tachycardia and gestational ages over 36 weeks, the pregnancy may be terminated. However, in recent years, some major centres have recommended the initiation of transplacental therapy to allow for control of the foetal heart rate and to minimise the risk associated with late preterm birth. Another scenario in which transplacental therapy is recommended at gestational ages &gt; 36 weeks is in the case of hydropic foetuses, as it may improve pulmonary function [9]. </P>
</Sect>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H2>Conclusion </H2>

<P>When assessing a pregnant woman with foetal arrhythmia, one of the first diagnostic tests to be performed is a foetal echocardiogram to determine the type of foetal arrhythmia and rule out any structural abnormalities. Once the type of arrhythmia has been determined, the appropriate antiarrhythmic drug can be selected. Fetal supraventricular tachycardia presents a significant challenge in obstetric practice, as it is a condition requiring timely diagnosis and treatment, given its major implications for the normal course of pregnancy, such as foetal death, preterm birth and heart failure leading to foetal hydrops. The presence of foetal hydrops as a complication significantly increases morbidity and mortality, with mortality rates reaching up to 27% in untreated cases. In cases of associated foetal hydrops, the time taken to convert to sinus rhythm is usually longer and, in some cases, conversion is unsuccessful. Transplacental pharmacological management is the cornerstone of treatment. Drugs such as flecainide and sotalol have historically been the first-line options in hydropic foetuses. However, recent evidence suggests that digoxin is as effective as flecainide and more effective than sotalol in restoring foetal sinus rhythm, which is why digoxin could be considered the first-line therapeutic option in situations where other antiarrhythmics are not available, as in the present </P>
</Sect>

<P>case. It is advisable to initiate antiarrhythmic C.H.P., L.G. and N.A.T. participated in the therapy early to prevent progression to heart analysis and interpretation of ultrasound data failure, foetal hydrops and foetal death. results, image acquisition, clinical management of the case, follow-up, manuscript review, and </P>

<Sect>
<H3>Informed consent </H3>

<P>final approval. The authors state that they obtained written </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H3>Conflict of interest </H3>
</Sect>

<P>informed consent from the patient for the publication of photographs and the corresponding The authors declare no conflicts of interest. clinical material. </P>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<Sect>
<H3>Use of AI </H3>
</Sect>

<P>Authors’ contributions </P>

<Sect>
<P>The authors declare that artificial intelligence </P>
</Sect>

<P>J.A.P.R. performed clinical data acquisition, was not used in this work. follow-up, and manuscript drafting. </P>
</Sect>
</Sect>

<Sect>
<H2>References </H2>

<L>
<LI>
<Lbl>1. </Lbl>

<LBody>Carvalho JS. Fetal dysrhythmias. Vol. 58, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Bailliere Tindall Ltd; 2019. p. 28–41. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.002 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>2. </Lbl>

<LBody>Gozar L, Gabor-miklosi D, Toganel R, Fagarasan A, Gozar H, Toma D, et al. Fetal Tachyarrhythmia Management from Digoxin to Amiodarone—A Review. Vol. 11, J Clin Medicine. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030804 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>3. </Lbl>

<LBody>Weber R, Stambach D, Jaeggi E. Diagnosis and management of common foetal arrhythmias. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, editor. Vol. 23. 2011. p. 61–6. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2011.01.008 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>4. </Lbl>

<LBody>Vedel C, Vejlstrup N, Jensen LN, Ekelund CK, Ngaard LN, Harmsen L, et al. Refractory Fetal Supraventricular Tachycardia with Hydrops Successfully Converted by Intraperitoneal Flecainide in the Fetus: A Case Report. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1 September 2020;47(9):717–20. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1159/000508811 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>5. </Lbl>

<LBody>Holmes S, Hornberger LK, Jaeggi E, Howley L, Moon-Grady AJ, Uzun O, et al. Treatment, not delivery, of the late preterm and term foetus with supraventricular arrhythmia. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1 October 2023;62(4):552–7. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26239 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>6. </Lbl>

<LBody>Wacker-Gussmann A, Strasburger JF, Cuneo BF, Wakai RT. Diagnosis and treatment of foetal arrhythmia. Vol. 31, Am J Perinatol. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2014. p. 617–28. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1372430 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>7. </Lbl>

<LBody>Swearingen C, Colvin ZA, Leuthner SR. Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis. Vol. 47, Clinics in Perinatology. W.B. Saunders; 2020. p. 105–21. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2019.10.001 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>8. </Lbl>

<LBody>Younge T, Ottolini K, Al-Kouatly H, Berger S. Hydrops fetalis: Incidence, Etiologies, Management Strategies, and Outcomes. Res Rep Neonatol. 20 Dec 2023;Vol. 13:81–92. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.2147/RRN.S411736 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>9. </Lbl>

<LBody>Strasburger JF, Eckstein G, Butler M, Noffke P, Wacker-Gussmann A. Fetal Arrhythmia Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Management. J Clin Pharmacol. 1 September 2022;62:S53–66. 
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.2129 </Link>
</LBody>
</LI>

<LI>
<Lbl>10. </Lbl>

<LBody>Jaeggi ET, Carvalho JS, De Groot E, Api O, Clur SAB, Rammeloo L, et al. Comparison of transplacental treatment of foetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with digoxin, flecainide, and sotalol: Results of a non-randomised multicentre study. Pediatr Cardiol. 28 October 2011;124(16):1747–54. </LBody>
</LI>
</L>

<Sect>
<P>
<Link>https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026120 </Link>
</P>
</Sect>

<P>11.Celentano L, Yoshinaga K, Shiba SK, Gaynor Z, Rudolph J. A Rare and Challenging Case of Refractory Fetal Supraventricular Tachycardia. Cureus. 8 September 2022;14(9):e28947. </P>

<Sect>
<P>
<Link>https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28947 </Link>
</P>
</Sect>
<Figure>

<ImageData src="imagenes/Reporte de Caso-5567_img_4.png"/>
</Figure>
</Sect>
</Part>
</TaggedPDF-doc>
